Agrarian Reform in Indonesia: Analyze Concepts and Their Implementation from a Governance Perspective

Abstract

Analysis of the relationship between inequality, agrarian reform and corruption as well as public administration reform has not been discussed, both in terms of the formation and implementation of agrarian reform in Indonesia. This article aims to explore the concept and implementation of agrarian reform, as well as the influence of governance conditions in the management of natural resources in the implementation of agrarian reform. With the characteristics of agrarian issues in Indonesia, land administration and those related to the implementation of redistribution of benefits from the use of natural resources need to be strengthened with appropriate concepts or theories, including public information disclosure as a fulfillment of substantive and deliberative implementation of democracy. In addition, by referring to experiences in other countries, agrarian reform needs to be carried out by reducing the level of clientelism and implemented through a number of corruption prevention and prosecution programs, especially in the fields of land and other natural resources.

Defining the objectives and roles of Indonesian production forest governance through the multi-business forestry policy narrative

“…Land use in areas agreed to be forested (protection, production and conservation) requires special licensing mechanisms, including lend-using forest areas, social forestry, land as objects of agrarian reform and forest land use changes (release of forest areas to become non forest) [68,69]. Despite the high costs [70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77], these mechanisms have become popular because they fulfil the de jure and de facto aspects of business certainty. Multi Business Forestry (Mb-F) is not abolishing but a choice of a new mechanism among existing mechanisms or an option to The policy aspect that became the focus of the resource persons was that the Mb-F would involve various parties from the government, the private sector and community groups, each of which had different work areas and performance indicators.…”

Analyzing Information System Quality and Financial Information Quality: An Evidence of Local Government Organizations in Indonesia

“…After Pandemic COVID-19 disasters has significantly affect community in various sectors, such as health, education, economic, and other governmental sectors (Iqbal et al, 2020;Kustiyahningsih et al, 2022;Latifah & Soewarno, 2023;Pramukti et al, 2022) the Indonesian government stimulates the micro, small, and medium business sectors to support the country's economy and government policy by set up a decentralization policies (Ajija et al, 2022;Kartodihardjo & Cahyono, 2021;Rahayuningsih et al, 2019;Tjahjadi et al, 2023;Valina Hartono, 2017;Widiastuti et al, 2021).…”