1993
DOI: 10.2307/1243605
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Agrarian Reform in Eastern Europe following World War I: Motives and Outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, different state policies can be observed regarding the goals and means of these reforms. One of the most general motivations was rural poverty and presence of the rural proletariat due to the high ratios of land concentration in East Central Europe (Thompson 1993).…”
Section: Changing Borders Changing Development Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, different state policies can be observed regarding the goals and means of these reforms. One of the most general motivations was rural poverty and presence of the rural proletariat due to the high ratios of land concentration in East Central Europe (Thompson 1993).…”
Section: Changing Borders Changing Development Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, in the first Czechoslovak Republic a rather radical land distribution took place (Berend 1985). The land reform inevitably had a strong ethnical dimension, as the majority of the agricultural elite was Hungarian in the Slovak territories, and German in Bohemia and Moravia before WWI (Thompson 1993, Miller 2003and Sombati 2015. For example, on the southern part of Slovakia, which was reannexed to Hungary in 1938, the lands were owned almost entirely by Hungarians before WWI (since the locals primarily were Hungarians), while 25% of the land redistributed was given to local Slovaks, 18.2% to Slovak, Czech and Moravian colonists, and only 19% to local Hungarians (Simon 2009 and2014).…”
Section: Changing Borders Changing Development Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wydaje siê, ¿e odtworzenie formalno-prawnego stanu posiadania gruntów by³o ³atwiejsze w krajach, które pojawi³y siê na mapie Europy po I wojnie wiatowej i gdzie w wyniku reform rolnych znacz¹co powiêkszono sektor prywatnych gospodarstw rodzinnych (Czechy, kraje ba³kañskie i nadba³tyckie) [Nowa Encyklopedia...1996, Roszkowski 1989, Thompson 1993, Vaskela 1996]. Z kolei jednak konsekwentne odtwarzanie gospodarstw rodzinnych wykreowa³o problem ekstremalnego rozdrobnienia gruntów (Albania, Rumunia).…”
unclassified
“…According to Stavrianos, by 1926, 80.6 per cent of the peasants owned the land they tilled, 16.8 per cent owned plots but were willing to rent more and 2.6 per cent rented all the land they worked. By 1934, when the Military League established a dictatorship, 94 per cent of the land consisted of holdings less than 300 decares with 87 per cent at a size less than 100 decares (Thompson 1993). In 1941, distribution of land was still an issue of concern as Article 1 of The Land Law of 1941 stated that its goal was the creation of a state land fund to fight the hunger for land and unemployment in agriculture (V'lchanov 1954, 93).…”
Section: The Evolution Of the Post-liberation Land Tenure Regimementioning
confidence: 99%