1992
DOI: 10.1093/ptj/72.9.624
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Agonist and Antagonist Activity During Voluntary Upper-Limb Movement in Patients with Stroke

Abstract: Forty-four patients with hemiplegia following stroke and 10 nondisabled subjects were studied to examine the contributions inadequate motor unit recruitment and co-contraction attributable to impaired antagonist inhibition play in the movement disorder of the hemiplegic arm. Electromyographic data were recorded from agonist and antagonist muscles while subjects attempted six specified tasks. Data from subjects who could complete the tasks were compared with those who could not complete the tasks. Differences b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
98
0
5

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 217 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
98
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…However, if rapid movements nevertheless cannot be implemented, a reduced use of neuronal elements is likely to be responsible (Rosenfalck and Andreassen, 1980). Recent studies have documented that decreased recruitment of agonist motor units rather than increased antagonist co-contraction predominates in hemiplegia (Gowland et al, 1992, Fellows et al, 1994. These developmental differences may explain the reduced speed of the abduction movement found in this study in patients as well as the relatively unaffected duration of anteversion.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 44%
“…However, if rapid movements nevertheless cannot be implemented, a reduced use of neuronal elements is likely to be responsible (Rosenfalck and Andreassen, 1980). Recent studies have documented that decreased recruitment of agonist motor units rather than increased antagonist co-contraction predominates in hemiplegia (Gowland et al, 1992, Fellows et al, 1994. These developmental differences may explain the reduced speed of the abduction movement found in this study in patients as well as the relatively unaffected duration of anteversion.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 44%
“…Reduced agonist recruitment capacity, as a consequence of stroke, can prevent the completion of upper extremity tasks (Gowland et al 1992). Similarly, our results indicate that muscle weakness constrains the movement patterns available to the CNS because primary agonist muscles alone are not capable of generating the required execution torques.…”
Section: Stereotypical Compensatory Movement Strategy In the Paretic mentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Clinically, muscle synergies have been associated with constraints on movement in motor deficit, for example the "pathological synergies" associated with stroke [40,41]. How can we reconcile this conception of muscle synergies with the above studies demonstrating healthy subjects using muscle synergies as a flexible, dextrous strategy?…”
Section: Muscle Synergiesmentioning
confidence: 99%