2007
DOI: 10.1300/j194v05n02_02
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aging Well in an Intentional Intergenerational Community

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A report published by the Intergenerational Center at Temple University detailed outcomes of decreased isolation and an increased sense of purpose for older adult volunteers in schools (Henkin et al, 2012). Additionally, benefits of holistic well-being have been documented for an intentional intergenerational community focused on purposeful engagement (Power et al, 2007).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A report published by the Intergenerational Center at Temple University detailed outcomes of decreased isolation and an increased sense of purpose for older adult volunteers in schools (Henkin et al, 2012). Additionally, benefits of holistic well-being have been documented for an intentional intergenerational community focused on purposeful engagement (Power et al, 2007).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conceptual analysis is not empirical research or synthesis. Some of this evidence does, likely, exist within various case studies and could be identified with careful execution beyond the scope of this analysis (Including: Chan and Chan, 2003; Eheart, Power and Hopping, 2003; Power et al , 2007; Glass, 2009, 2014). We cannot draw conclusions about the merits of symbiotic care, and although we do not attempt to hide our enthusiasm for future research in this area, we are also aware of the potential risks – which may be exacerbated if this model of care is improperly understood and implemented.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One common focus, and increasing trend in Canada, is on promoting intergenerational groupings; some cultures and societies have done this more consistently than others (Vestbro and Horelli, 2012; Yang, 2013; Labit and Dubost, 2016). Evidence shows that mixing population needs, abilities, ages or backgrounds can create more socially dynamic environments and bonds (Arentshorst et al , 2019; Eheart et al , 2003; Power et al , 2007). Furthermore, diversity within the SIH setting means that residents may be more able and likely to perform reciprocal exchanges of tasks and services, and indeed sometimes provide substantial physical and psychological care to each other (see model case description, Box 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%