2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2020.101635
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aging responses of an Al-Cu alloy fabricated by selective laser melting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The density of intragrain dislocations (mostly perfect and Frank type) are remarkably close to the GND densities estimated in the rapid solidification PFC-AE simulations, as summarized in table 3. These dislocation densities are 10-20 times larger than the listed experimentally measured dislocation densities [20,[63][64][65][66]. As discussed more thoroughly in the Introduction section, there are several sources of error in the experimental evaluation of dislocation densities that can, to some extent, explain the discrepancy between the MD and PFC-AE simulations and the experiments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The density of intragrain dislocations (mostly perfect and Frank type) are remarkably close to the GND densities estimated in the rapid solidification PFC-AE simulations, as summarized in table 3. These dislocation densities are 10-20 times larger than the listed experimentally measured dislocation densities [20,[63][64][65][66]. As discussed more thoroughly in the Introduction section, there are several sources of error in the experimental evaluation of dislocation densities that can, to some extent, explain the discrepancy between the MD and PFC-AE simulations and the experiments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…and transmission electron microscopy-based line-intercept measurements (TEM line-inter.). simulation results in this work unit perfect Frank Shockley others MD pure Al 1.9 1.1 41 0.42 MD Al–1 at%Cu 1.7 1.2 45 0.39 PFC pure Al, low V 0.1 (GND) PFC pure Al, high V 1.7 (GND) PF–CP Al–4.5at%Cu 0.004–0.005 (SSD) past experimental results EBSD, AM Al-Cu [ 63 ] 0.072 (GND) XRD, melt spun Al 7075 [ 64 ] 0.057 (total) XRD, melt spun Al 5083 [ 65 ] 0.14 (total) …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The density of intragrain dislocations (mostly perfect and Frank type) are remarkably close to the GND densities estimated in the rapid solidification PFC-AE simulations, as summarized in Table 3. These dislocation densities are 10-20 times larger than the listed experimentally measured dislocation densities [67,68,66,69,20]. As discussed more thoroughly in the Introduction section, there are several sources of error in the experimental evaluation of dislocation densities that can, to some extent, explain the discrepancy between the MD and PFC-AE simulations and the experiments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…), and transmission electron microscopy based line-intercept measurements (TEM line-inter.). [66] 0.072 (GND) 10 15 m −2 XRD, Melt spun Al 7075 [67] 0.057 (Total) 10 15 m −2 XRD, Melt spun Al 5083 [68] 0.14 (Total) 10 15 m −2 XRD, AM Al-Si-Mg [20] 0.92 (Total) 10 15 m −2 Neutron diffr., AM Al-Si-Mg [16] 0.16-0.50 (Total) 10 15 m −2 TEM line-inter., AM Al-Si-Mg [69] 0.11-0.31 (Total) 10 15 m −2 aluminium was considered in the PFC simulations. Interaction between copper segregation and defect structures would be interesting to consider on diffusive time scales in PFC simulations, in order to better understand the emergence of pre-precipitates in rapid aluminium alloys.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alloying element-wise tensile yield strength and elongation of selected high-strength alloys [11,14,38,[41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57]. TE-transition element(s), AB-as-built, SA-solution treated and aged, DA-Direct aged.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%