2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.08.088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aging of microplastics promotes their ingestion by marine zooplankton

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
182
3
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 367 publications
(190 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
4
182
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The presence of biofilms may influence the likelihood of microplastic ingestion due to chemical cues exuded by the colonizing organisms. For example, in lab exposures Vroom et al () observed that polystyrene microplastics, primed by immersion in seawater, were ingested by two of three marine zooplankton species tested at a greater rate than unprimed plastics. Savoca et al () hypothesized that the odor of dimethyl sulfide‐related chemicals that accumulated on plastics increased their consumption by sea birds.…”
Section: Fate Of Microplastics In the Oceanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of biofilms may influence the likelihood of microplastic ingestion due to chemical cues exuded by the colonizing organisms. For example, in lab exposures Vroom et al () observed that polystyrene microplastics, primed by immersion in seawater, were ingested by two of three marine zooplankton species tested at a greater rate than unprimed plastics. Savoca et al () hypothesized that the odor of dimethyl sulfide‐related chemicals that accumulated on plastics increased their consumption by sea birds.…”
Section: Fate Of Microplastics In the Oceanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, unless microplastic concentrations are too low to be detected, characteristics of different filter feeding species probably affect whether microplastic ingestion is solely a matter of chance of encounters. Several copepoda and bivalves are known to be able to discriminate between edible and non-edible particles, leading to post-ingestive food selection or pausing of feeding when edible to non-edible particle ratios are insufficient (Ayukai, 1987;Brillant & MacDonald, 2000;Donaghay & Small, 1979;Huntley, Barthel, & Star, 1983;Vroom, Koelmans, Besseling, & Halsband, 2017;Wegner et al, 2012). Other species are known to adjust ingestion rates depending on the nutritional value or the size of the food (Koelmans et al, 2013;Wilson, 1973).…”
Section: Particle Size 2015 2100mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These "camouflaged" plastic particles can be ingested by organisms such as zooplankton (Eich et al 2015;Vroom et al 2017) and even larger organisms. Some laboratory experiments concluded that bioavailability of plastics seems to be enhanced by particles that have been exposed to natural seawater for some time (Bråte et al 2018).…”
Section: Microplastics As a Vector For Pathogensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, entanglement and ingestion are the most common types of interaction between biota and plastics (Gregory 2009). Fouling of bacteria on plastic particles may promote the ingestion of plastic materials by biota (Zettler et al 2013;Vroom et al 2017). Microplastic ingestion has been described for many taxa of animals including plankton, invertebrates, fish, sea turtles, and marine mammals (Cole et al 2013;Foekema et al 2013;Schuyler et al 2013;Hämer et al 2014;Lusher et al 2015;Scherer et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%