2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2016.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aging of atmospherically plasma sprayed chromium evaporation barriers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[13][14][15][16] However, even with the most effective protective coatings Cr cannot be completely prevented from entering the gas phase and finally reacting with the cathode material. Uncoated balance-of-plant components are an almost unavoidable source of volatile Cr species under SOFC operating conditions.…”
Section: -4mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[13][14][15][16] However, even with the most effective protective coatings Cr cannot be completely prevented from entering the gas phase and finally reacting with the cathode material. Uncoated balance-of-plant components are an almost unavoidable source of volatile Cr species under SOFC operating conditions.…”
Section: -4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11,12 In particular, dense layers applied by atmospheric plasma spraying (APS) have proven able to reduce the Cr deposition on the cathode and thereby considerably lessen degradation. [13][14][15][16] However, even with the most effective protective coatings Cr cannot be completely prevented from entering the gas phase and finally reacting with the cathode material. Uncoated balance-of-plant components are an almost unavoidable source of volatile Cr species under SOFC operating conditions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, during SOFC operation the formation of volatile Cr oxides and especially oxyhydroxides may deteriorate the cathode and/or the cathode/electrolyte interface . Therefore, various coating types are being used to minimize the formation of volatile Cr species , ; in JÜLICH's standard F10 design an atmospheric plasma sprayed (APS) coating of MCF is being applied .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In case of the stack showing a higher degradation rate, a manganese oxide (MnOx) layer was applied by WPS, while the interconnectors of the other stack are coated with an MCF protective coating applied by APS. In contrast to WPS-MnOx layers, it is known that APS-MCF layers are rather dense [19]. From these two stacks it can be concluded that APS-MCF coatings are promising candidates for chromium protection layers (assuming that most of the additional degradation originates from the chromium-cathode interaction).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Magnetron sputtering enables the deposition of very thin and dense protective layers [11] showing high conductivities but have to prove their stability in the long term and in stack tests. Further research on aerosol deposition [14], electrophoretic deposition [15,16], wet chemical methods [17] or several thermal spray techniques [12,[18][19][20] revealed low chromium diffusion rates. Nevertheless, all protective coatings must exhibit minimum degradation for long-term operation within real stack tests.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%