2019
DOI: 10.1080/0361073x.2019.1664465
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aging Effects on the Visual Span for Alphabetic Stimuli

Abstract: Background: The visual span (i.e., an estimate of the number of letters that can be recognized reliably on a single glance) is widely considered to impose an important sensory limitation on reading speed. With the present research, we investigated adult age differences in the visual span for alphabetic stimuli (i.e., Latin alphabetic letters), as aging effects on span size may make an important contribution to slower reading speeds in older adulthood. Method: A trigram task, in which sets of three letters were… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…to be approximately 1.2 characters smaller than that of young adults, suggesting that sensory limitations contribute to age differences in the uptake of parafoveal information during reading (Warrington et al, 2019). This is consistent with evidence that older adults are relatively less impaired than young adults in reading 'filtered' text for which only low spatialfrequency information is available, and relatively more impaired when only high spatialfrequency information is available (Jordan et al, 2014;Paterson et al, 2013).…”
Section: Parafoveal Processing In Readingsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…to be approximately 1.2 characters smaller than that of young adults, suggesting that sensory limitations contribute to age differences in the uptake of parafoveal information during reading (Warrington et al, 2019). This is consistent with evidence that older adults are relatively less impaired than young adults in reading 'filtered' text for which only low spatialfrequency information is available, and relatively more impaired when only high spatialfrequency information is available (Jordan et al, 2014;Paterson et al, 2013).…”
Section: Parafoveal Processing In Readingsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Impairments in older adults’ use of parafoveal and peripheral visual information in nonreading tasks (e.g., Ball et al, 1988; Sekuler et al, 2000) appear to reflect deficits in extrafoveal visual acuity. For example, the average visual span of older adults has been found to be approximately 1.2 characters smaller than that of young adults, suggesting that sensory limitations contribute to age differences in the uptake of parafoveal information during reading (Warrington et al, 2019). This is consistent with evidence that older adults are relatively less impaired than young adults in reading “filtered” text for which only low-spatial-frequency information is available, and relatively more impaired when only high-spatial-frequency information is available (Jordan et al, 2014; Paterson et al, 2013).…”
Section: Parafoveal Processing In Readingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to previous studies examining the reading speed of RSVP and scrolling within normally‐sighted participants without CVL simulation, 26 simCVL observers in this study read RSVP significantly faster as defined by duration threshold, and the maximum reading speed was significantly faster for RSVP than scrolling at all font sizes. We speculate that task demands for reading scrolling and RSVP text, such as the visual span, which decreases with age 35 may differentially impact older and younger observers. The smaller the font size, the slower the reading speed, regardless of text presentation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Young subjects showed faster TTT and higher SVS than older subjects at central vision . The sensory decline in older adults limits the amount of information processed in each glance, requiring longer time to process the information (Warrington et al, 2019). Despite a stronger crowding effect in peripheral vision, the decline of SVS and TTT at peripheral vision was weaker in older adults.…”
Section: Effect Of Age On Chinese Reading Performancementioning
confidence: 95%