2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2012.04.003
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aging effects on functional auditory and visual processing using fMRI with variable sensory loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
36
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
6
36
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Perception considerably interacts with cognition and deficits in the auditory and visual acuity; the sensory and motor ability were common in the elderly . Decreased functional connectivity in these three basic function networks was noted in both our study and previous task‐dependent fMRI studies . Therefore, these deficits are probably because of not only structural or physical degeneration but also functional processing in the brain or perhaps, decreased functional connectivity is just the result of less external information input.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Perception considerably interacts with cognition and deficits in the auditory and visual acuity; the sensory and motor ability were common in the elderly . Decreased functional connectivity in these three basic function networks was noted in both our study and previous task‐dependent fMRI studies . Therefore, these deficits are probably because of not only structural or physical degeneration but also functional processing in the brain or perhaps, decreased functional connectivity is just the result of less external information input.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…These changes include a reduction in visual acuity and auditory sensitivity due to changes in transduction processes in the retina and cochlea (Baltes and Lindenberger, 1997,Lindenberger and Baltes, 1997,Lindenberger and Ghisletta, 2009), as well as age-related changes along the sensory processing hierarchies (Cliff, et al, 2013,Hugenschmidt, et al, 2009,Nagamatsu, et al, 2011). In the current study we saw such effects very clearly, with a significant main effect of age group for both the auditory-only and visual-only conditions in which younger adults performed better than younger adults.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Potential sources of longitudinal within-subject variance in fMRI recordings include, but are not limited to: habituation effects (Hamid et al, 2015), strategy shifts/practice effects (Kelly and Garavan, 2005), fatigue, lapses of attention, caffeine (Koppelstaetter and Poeppel, 2010; Liu et al, 2004), nicotine (Warbrick et al, 2012, 2011), time-of-day (Gaggioni et al, 2014; Schmidt et al, 2015), aging (Cliff et al, 2013; Koch et al, 2010), residual levels of physiological noise(Birn, 2012), distinct geometric distortions across sessions (Raemaekers et al, 2012), or progression of clinical conditions. As our understanding of natural within-subject variability in both neuronal and fMRI responses improves, additional factors may need to be added to this list.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%