Aging Effect in Prospective Memory Monitoring: An Eye-Tracking Study

Yoruk, Asli

doi:10.31086/tjgeri.2022.323

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Discussion1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2023

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This finding is consistent with the multiple processes view. In addition, in previous studies using the Virtual Week, participants were more successful in event-based tasks than in time-based tasks (Jager and Kliegel 2008, Rose et al 2010, Henry et al 2012, Foster et al 2013, Mioni et al 2015, Niedzwienska et al 2016, Zuber et al 2016, Fronda et al, 2020, Bozdemir and Cinan 2021, Yörük and Cangöz-Tavat 2022, Pakyürek and Cangöz-Tavat 2023. Jager and Kliegel (2008) suggested that this difference increases with aging because the internal functioning of time deteriorates with aging.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 90%

Relationship between Working Memory, Retrospective Memory and Strategic Monitoring with Prospective Memory Performance

PAKYÜREK,

CANGÖZ-TAVAT

2023

Psikiyatride Güncel Yaklaşımlar

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Working memory is one of the significant factors that can influence prospective memory. Prospective memory inherently encompasses elements of retrospective memory, and strategic monitoring also affects performance. Therefore, the study investigates the relationship between strategic monitoring, retrospective memory, working memory, and prospective memory. The study involved 120 participants (60 females and 60 males). The Beck Depression Inventory, n-Back tasks, and Virtual Week tasks were administered to the participants. According to the findings, working memory performance predicts prospective memory (β= .30; p

show abstract