2007
DOI: 10.3758/bf03194450
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aging and the perception of local surface orientation from optical patterns of shading and specular highlights

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While this is compatible with previous conclusions [16], it is surprising given the complex heuristics assumed to make such classifications [2], [4] and the types of visual processing for which there is evidence of age-related decline. Ageing is typically thought to disrupt complex processes more than simple ones: older people maintain the ability to discriminate relatively simple shapes or features, including orientation [10][11], [13] while showing impaired integration of features or shapes across time or space [11][13], [29].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While this is compatible with previous conclusions [16], it is surprising given the complex heuristics assumed to make such classifications [2], [4] and the types of visual processing for which there is evidence of age-related decline. Ageing is typically thought to disrupt complex processes more than simple ones: older people maintain the ability to discriminate relatively simple shapes or features, including orientation [10][11], [13] while showing impaired integration of features or shapes across time or space [11][13], [29].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…While not suggesting any parallels between those neurological dysfunctions and ageing or AD, we wondered whether ageing might also reduce the ability to appropriately process lighting-related visual information? This has been little investigated, although Norman & Wiesemann [16] found judgements of surface orientation from shading and highlights to be age-impaired in one experiment and age-equivalent in another. Here we focus on cast shadows: the failure to discard these as lighting “artefacts” by misinterpreting them as objects or parts of objects might increase the visual clutter present in a scene.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that aging is known to produce quantitative reductions in performance for a variety of 3-D tasks involving the utilization of binocular disparity (Laframboise et al, 2006;Norman, Dawson, & Butler, 2000;Norman et al, 2008), motion (Andersen & Atchley, 1995;Norman et al, 2004;Norman, Dawson, & Butler, 2000), lambertian shading (Norman & Wiesemann, 2007), and specular highlights (Norman & Wiesemann, 2007), it more accurate than those obtained by Braunstein (our observers' mean slope was 0.66, whereas the slope obtained by Braunstein was 0.32; perfectly accurate performance would be indicated by a slope of 1.0).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 43%
“…Although there are significant effects of age upon the stereoscopic perception of 3D shape (Norman, Dawson, & Butler, 2000; Norman, Crabtree, Herrmann, et al, 2006), these age-related changes are usually quantitative rather than qualitative in nature. For the most part, the stereoscopic systems of older observers function similarly to those of younger observers (Norman & Wiesemann, 2007; Norman, Norman, et al, 2008). The same cannot be said for the visual perception of 3D shape from motion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same cannot be said for the visual perception of 3D shape from motion. While older observers can perceive 3D shape from motion (Andersen & Atchley, 1995; Blake, Rizzo, & McEvoy, 2008; Norman, Bartholomew, & Burton, 2008; Norman, Clayton, Shular, & Thompson, 2004; Norman et al, 2000; Norman & Wiesemann, 2007), their ability to recover information about 3D shape from motion fails if the temporal correspondence of moving surface points is sufficiently disrupted (see Norman et al, 2000, 2004). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%