2008
DOI: 10.1007/s11837-008-0069-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aging and loading rate effects on the mechanical behavior of equine bone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This difference in R-curve slope values suggests a sharp reduction and/or absence of toughening mechanisms in bone during high strain rates such as these associated with traumatic fracture conditions. This agrees well with: (1) the smooth fracture surface profiles observed in specimens tested under high loading rates (Behiri and Bonfield, 1980; Adharapurapu et al, 2006; Zioupos et al, 2006; Kulin et al, 2008); (2) the good positive correlations we have observed here between the experimentally measured microcrack number and the fracture toughness found in our simulations; (3) the previous study by Vashishth et al, (1997) which demonstrated that increased microcracking leads to higher bone toughness; (4) the experimental observations by Kulin et al (2008, 2010, 2011) that bone subjected to quasi-static loading undergoes significant peripheral damage during crack propagation whereas bone subjected to dynamic loading did not exhibit a large amount of damage; (5) the observations by Zioupos et al (2008) that the key to bone s brittleness in high strain rates is the strain and damage localization occurring early on in the process, which leads to low post-yield strains, low energy absorption to failure and less collateral damage alongside the fracture front.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This difference in R-curve slope values suggests a sharp reduction and/or absence of toughening mechanisms in bone during high strain rates such as these associated with traumatic fracture conditions. This agrees well with: (1) the smooth fracture surface profiles observed in specimens tested under high loading rates (Behiri and Bonfield, 1980; Adharapurapu et al, 2006; Zioupos et al, 2006; Kulin et al, 2008); (2) the good positive correlations we have observed here between the experimentally measured microcrack number and the fracture toughness found in our simulations; (3) the previous study by Vashishth et al, (1997) which demonstrated that increased microcracking leads to higher bone toughness; (4) the experimental observations by Kulin et al (2008, 2010, 2011) that bone subjected to quasi-static loading undergoes significant peripheral damage during crack propagation whereas bone subjected to dynamic loading did not exhibit a large amount of damage; (5) the observations by Zioupos et al (2008) that the key to bone s brittleness in high strain rates is the strain and damage localization occurring early on in the process, which leads to low post-yield strains, low energy absorption to failure and less collateral damage alongside the fracture front.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…For example, using quasi-static conditions, some of the earlier studies done on bovine or equine bone reported an increase in initiation fracture resistance measured as energy absorption or critical stress intensity factor with increasing strain rates up to a certain level after which a decrease was observed (Piekarski, 1970; Crowninshield and Pope, 1974; Robertson and Smith, 1978; Behiri and Bonfield, 1980, 1984; Evans et al, 1992). More recent investigations also reported similar trends where fracture toughness in bovine and equine bone (Adharapurapu et al, 2006; Charoenphan and Polchai, 2007; Kulin et al, 2008; Kulin et al, 2010; Kulin et al, 2011) and energy to fracture in human cortical bone (Zioupos et al, 2008) decreased with increasing strain rate. The only study that measured the propagation toughness at a high strain rate reported the loading rate effects on the R-curve behavior of equine cortical bone (Kulin et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…After the specimen was loaded, the displacement was increased by increments of 0.0127 mm (0.0005 in.). It is recognized that a load rate has an impact on the fracture toughness [10] and is important in the study of relaxation and changes in response. Therefore, the duration of the manual increments in the displacements was carefully monitored with a timer.…”
Section: Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These range from the specimen geometry [9], loading rate [10], temperature during testing [11], age [12], orientation [13], and location [14], to the preservation method. Yan et al [11] found that fracture toughness decreases with the increase in temperature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental studies show that the fracture behavior of bone changes with loading rate (Behiri and Bonfield, 1980, 1984; Evans et al, 1992; Adharapurapu et al, 2006; Hansen et al, 2008; Kulin et al, 2008; Zioupos et al, 2008; Kulin et al, 2011a; Kulin et al, 2011b; Ural et al, 2011). Consequently, fracture risk may be underestimated due to an overestimation of the fracture load if the strain rate effects are not considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%