2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.01.314
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Agile vs. Traditional Approach in Project Management: Strategies, Challenges and Reasons to Introduce Agile

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
5

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
16
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…So-called traditional approaches can be seen as structured and sequential, but these terms do not reflect the complexity of contemporary product-service design and development projects. Projects in which the goal is clear but the solution is unclear benefit from the use of agile approaches [17,18]. Agile development [19] and human-centered innovation are non-rigid approaches, which have inspired and progressed design thinking [20,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So-called traditional approaches can be seen as structured and sequential, but these terms do not reflect the complexity of contemporary product-service design and development projects. Projects in which the goal is clear but the solution is unclear benefit from the use of agile approaches [17,18]. Agile development [19] and human-centered innovation are non-rigid approaches, which have inspired and progressed design thinking [20,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBoK) standard [8], from the Project Management Institute (PMI), focused more on the technical aspects, by providing information on the processes that can be carried out for effective management, and proposes different useful tools and techniques, which need to be adapted to the particular context of each project. On the other hand, the IPMA Competence Baseline (ICB) [19], developed by the International Project Management Association (IPMA), has a particularly focus on social and human aspects, by identifying the competences of those who lead and manage a project, which are grouped in contextual, behavioral, and technical competences [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two main approaches to project management: the 'traditional' approach and the agile approach [20]. The 'traditional' approach can be applied to any project environment; however, in situations where projects involve volatility of requirements, a high degree of uncertainty of change, ambiguity, and a complex project environment, the 'traditional' approach presents difficulties in responding effectively [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From this, it can be concluded that agile is a mindset with a focus on the customer and on iterative development, both of which increase the transparency and the continuous enhancement of processes. [62] Ciric et al evaluate the introduction of agile project management versus traditional project management in both software and non-software developing forms of organization [63]. The advantage of agile techniques is the adaption of products and business models to complex and rapidly changing business conditions.…”
Section: Relation Of Dh Scopesmentioning
confidence: 99%