Agile manufacturing in practice ‐ Application of a methodology

Abstract

An evolutionary transformation of business environment, with change as a main characteristic, is taking place. Manufacturing companies, even those operating in relatively stable conditions with good market positions, are facing rapid and often unanticipated changes in their business environment. Agile manufacturing is proposed in response to the circumstances as a solution and is perceived as a vital characteristic that manufacturing companies need to have in order to maintain their competitive advantages in the new order of world business. Each company will respond in a specific and different way to the changing circumstances by deploying its own agile characteristics. Agility in manufacturing may be achieved through the implementation and integration of appropriate practices which provide the required abilities for a company to respond properly to changes. Based on this concept, a methodology for achieving agility in manufacturing organisations is developed. The methodology is applied in two manufacturing companies and data collected from the applications are used to validate the methodology. This paper provides a brief summary of the methodology and details its implementation and validation in the two case study companies. Practices are proposed to support the achievement of agility in the two organisations.

A Study on the ‘Flexibility’ of Information Systems (Part 1): Why Do They Need to Be Flexible?

“…In addition, information technology (IT) innovations such as component-based and service-oriented software architectures (Bieberstein, et al, 2006), Web services (Whiting, 2003), autonomous computing concepts (Horn, 2001), and mobile applications (Siau et al, 2001) promise greater flexibility than the mainframe, client/server, and nonmobile systems they are meant to replace; yet, they require significant upfront investments.…”

“…Furthermore, these shortcomings have significant implications for practitioners, rendering agile method comparison and many other activities very difficult, especially in instances such as distributed development and large teams that are not conducive to many of the commercial agile methods (Conboy, 2009). Mathiassen & Pries-Heje (2006) referred to business agility as a relatively new paradigm painted as a solution for maintaining competitive advantage during times of uncertainty and turbulence in the business environment (Sharifi & Zhang, 2001). Merriam-Webster Online defines an agile mind as having a quick, resourceful, and adaptable character.…”

The Role of Organizational Agility in Enhancing Organizational Excellence: A Study on Telecommunications Sector in Egypt

“…Agility refers to the use of changes as inherent opportunities in turbulent environment (Sharifi & Zhang, 2001). Agility refers to the ability to survive and progress in the variable and unpredictable environment (Dove, 2001).…”

Does organizational agility affect organizational learning capability? Evidence from commercial banking

“…Surviving in this turbulence is possible if organizations are able to recognize their changing environments and respond properly to unexpected changes (Sharifi & Zhang, 2001). Therefore, OA has emerged as a way for managing unforeseen organizational changes and managing risks (Khoramgah, 2012) and as a key competitive imperative (Tallon & Pinsonneault, 2011) allowing organizations to survive in economic crises (Nijssen & Paauwe, 2012).…”