2006
DOI: 10.1504/ijasm.2006.008856
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Agile manufacturing framework and practice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, several authors (Sharifi and Zhang, 1999;Yusuf and Adeleye, 2002) have seriously questioned their viability in dealing with the changing nature of the business environment and point out that survival requires the adoption of agile practices. So, since the degree of turbulence in the environment determines the degree of agility a firm requires (Zhang and Sharifi, 2000), it is essential for the firm to understand its business environment, measure the degree of turbulence and know how this will impact on its organisation (Ismail et al, 2006). Validation of the model verified that the five sub-dimensions of agile manufacturing have a common background or, in other words, agile manufacturing is reflected in the dimensions of agile human resources, agile technologies, value chain integration, concurrent engineering and knowledge management.…”
Section: Analysis and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, several authors (Sharifi and Zhang, 1999;Yusuf and Adeleye, 2002) have seriously questioned their viability in dealing with the changing nature of the business environment and point out that survival requires the adoption of agile practices. So, since the degree of turbulence in the environment determines the degree of agility a firm requires (Zhang and Sharifi, 2000), it is essential for the firm to understand its business environment, measure the degree of turbulence and know how this will impact on its organisation (Ismail et al, 2006). Validation of the model verified that the five sub-dimensions of agile manufacturing have a common background or, in other words, agile manufacturing is reflected in the dimensions of agile human resources, agile technologies, value chain integration, concurrent engineering and knowledge management.…”
Section: Analysis and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have identified that "CAD/CAM users' appreciation of integration", "communication between design office and other users", "training", "organisational effectiveness", "management commitment and support", "security of CAD/CAM interface" and "user friendliness of ERP systems" as the critical factors. Chang et al (1997) have pointed out the absence of a technology to integrate CAD/CAM Rapid introduction of new and modified products; dynamic reconfiguration of production processes; upgradable products; product customisation (Lee 1998) Capability to operate profitably in an environment of continuous and unpredictable changes (McGaughey 1999) Reduction in lead time and life expectancy of products; diversification of demand; new technologies (Ismail et al, 2006) Demand volume is relatively low and life span is comparatively short (Elkins et al, 2004) Improved design realization by reducing the number of iterations and accelerating shop drawing development and improvement (De Lapp et al, 2004) The necessity of reacting quickly to changes in apparel trends and meeting ever increasing competition made apparel producers apply CAD/CAM systems in their production processes (Yan and Fiorito 2007) Increased profit margins, reduced design time; robust design; sharing of new designs and prototype creation in very short period of time (Lin and Uhler 2002) Shorten design cycle (Nandkeolyar et al, 1997) Cutting design costs; reducing cycle time; reducing matching time; improving information flow (Soliman et al, 2001) The interfacing of CAD and CAM with scheduling and control. They have brought out a solution to overcome this deficiency using parametric technology.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SPSS package was used to conduct t-test and examine the acceptance of "Contribution of mold adviser package for enabling agility". In the first case, the test value was given as 9 which would mean that "90% of the opinions are in favor of successful Benefits of using M 4 front plate mold designed and analysed using mold adviser package Characteristics of AM that maps with the benefits achievable through the use of M 4 front plate mold Reduced cycle time Reduced cycle time (Ismail et al, 2006;Onuh et al, 2006;Elkins et al, 2004;Onuh and Hon, 2001;Vokurka and Fliedner, 1998) Reduced clamp force Reduced injection pressure Reduced shot volume Increased fill confidence Dynamic reconfiguration of production processes; upgradeable products (Lee, 1998) Reduced manufacturing cost (Onuh and Hon, 2001) Reconfigurability and low cost products (Gunasekaran, 1999;Vokurka and Fliedner, 1998) Increased quality prediction Quality improvement (Onuh and Hon, 2001;Gunasekaran, 1999;Vokurka and Fliedner, 1998) Table III. JEDT 7,2 contribution of mold adviser package for enabling agility in practice at 95% confidence interval". As the significant (two-tailed) values for some cases are less than 0.05, this null hypothesis is rejected.…”
Section: Statistical Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the recent years, few researchers have been aspiring to identify the Agile ITQFD strategies and criteria which would ascribe agile manufacturing (AM). For example, Ismail et al (2006) have enumerated agility performance indicators. Devadasan et al (2005) have brought out 20 criteria AM model.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%