2016 IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/ipdps.2016.120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Agile Live Migration of Virtual Machines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The memory migration techniques aim at continuing the current processing of those VMs which have to be migrated, and to achieve this goal, the memory contents of these VMs are also transferred; along with the memory content, CPU current state is also migrated. Many variations of memory migration techniques have been presented in the literature recently: hybrid memory copyoriented technique [3]; efficiency-oriented technique [4]; multiple application-oriented technique [5]; workload prediction-oriented technique [6]; NFV featured network-oriented technique [7]; Traffic sensitive technique [8]; Agile live migration technique [9]; Hash-Table oriented technique [10]; VNF live migration technique [11]. However, these techniques do not specifically address the issue of VM migration in DCCs by considering VM workload characteristics.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The memory migration techniques aim at continuing the current processing of those VMs which have to be migrated, and to achieve this goal, the memory contents of these VMs are also transferred; along with the memory content, CPU current state is also migrated. Many variations of memory migration techniques have been presented in the literature recently: hybrid memory copyoriented technique [3]; efficiency-oriented technique [4]; multiple application-oriented technique [5]; workload prediction-oriented technique [6]; NFV featured network-oriented technique [7]; Traffic sensitive technique [8]; Agile live migration technique [9]; Hash-Table oriented technique [10]; VNF live migration technique [11]. However, these techniques do not specifically address the issue of VM migration in DCCs by considering VM workload characteristics.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [31], the basic memory to properly run a VM is estimated to provide fast VM migration. To do so, the VM memory size is constrained with cgroups, then swapped-in pages are marked as hot pages and will build the minimum working set memory of a VM.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SEaMLESS, however, provides a fast estimation of the hot pages by enabling a dummy restore Gateway Process procedure. [31] will also suffer from slow service restoration if the required service hits several cold pages, which is not the case of SEaMLESS where the idle VM and its original memory environment is restored in case of user activity.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jettison [2] proposes partial VM migration in which only the working set of an idle VM is transferred to the destination, while the remaining memory pages are slowly demand-paged from the source. Agile [7] migration reduces the migration time by swapping the non-working set pages of a VM to a per-VM swap device and migrating only the working set pages using a hybrid pre/post-copy technique. Vecycle [18] stores a checkpoint at each machine which a VM has visited in the past.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%