The accumulated evidence that oxidative modification of LDL plays an important role in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis in animal models is very strong. The negative results in recent clinical studies have caused many to conclude that LDL oxidation may not be relevant in the human disease. Yet many of the lines of evidence that support the hypothesis have been demonstrated to apply also in humans. In this review, we briefly summarize the lines of evidence on which the hypothesis rests, its strengths, and its weaknesses. The defining characteristic of the fatty streak, the first visible lesion of atherosclerosis, both in animals and in humans is the "foam cell." This cell, loaded with droplets rich in cholesteryl esters, is derived mainly from arterial wall macrophages, which originate from circulating monocytes that have penetrated into the subendothelial space. Smooth muscle cells and endothelial cells in lesions also can and do accumulate lipid droplets, but monocyte-derived macrophage foam cells predominate. This being the case, an understanding of just how arterial macrophages take up and store their load of cholesterol should shed light on the mechanisms that initiate atherogenesis.
ORIGINS OF THE OXIDATIVE MODIFICATION HYPOTHESISBeginning in 1979, Goldstein, Brown, and their collaborators [reviewed in (1)] decided to pursue this problem, studying the metabolism of macrophages in cell culture. They noted the following apparent paradox: in patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia, even in those who express absolutely no functional LDL receptors, macrophage-derived foam cells nevertheless accumulate in the artery walls just as they do in hypercholesterolemic patients that have perfectly normal LDL receptors. The implication was that LDL must be somehow altered prior to its uptake by macrophages and then taken up, not by the native LDL receptor, but rather by some alternative macrophage receptor. Indeed, they found that the rate of uptake of native LDL by normal resident mouse peritoneal macrophages was very low even at very high LDL concentrations. There was very little increase in cell cholesterol content and certainly no generation of foam cells. They then tried modifying the LDL physically, chemically, or enzymatically, looking for some form of LDL that could turn macrophages into foam cells in vitro. Several modifications worked, but the most striking was chemical acetylation. Treatment of LDL with acetic anhydride yielded a form of LDL that bound to the macrophage specifically and with high affinity, was actively internalized, and led to intracellular cholesterol accumulation. They dubbed the putative receptor the acetyl-LDL receptor. That receptor was later cloned and characterized by Kodama et al. (2) in the laboratory of Monty Krieger. Because of its possible role in the LDL receptor-independent uptake of LDL and because of its broad ligand specificity, it was redesignated scavenger receptor A (SRA). However, acetyl-LDL itself is not a biological product and has never been f...