Aggressive behavior and the Rosenzweig Picture-Frustration (P-F) study

Rosenzweig, Saül

doi:10.1002/1097-4679(197610)32:4<885::aid-jclp2270320434>3.0.co;2-r

Cited by 57 publications

(69 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Other potentially relevant behavioral features could be derived from Rosenzweig's (1944Rosenzweig's ( , 1976 distinction between the extrapunitive, intropunitive, and impunitive character of responses, based on whether the responses are directed, respectively, to the source of the frustration, to the subject himself or herself, or to neither of the two.…”

Section: Studymentioning

confidence: 99%

Individual differences in situation–behavior profiles: A triple typology model.

Vansteelandt¹,

Mechelen²

1998

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A model is proposed to represent individual differences in situation-behavior profiles. The model consists of 3 components: (a) q'ypologies of person, situation, and behavior classes; (b) hierarchical relations between the classes of each typology; and (c) a characterization of the person types in terms of different sets of if (situation class) then (behavior class) rules by which the 3 typologies are linked to one another. A data analysis technique (INDCLAS) is available to induce a triple typology model from empirical data. To reveal the psychological mechanisms behind such a model, the classes of the model can be related to situation, behavior, and person features. As a result, person types can be interpreted in terms of systems of cognitive-affective variables that mediate between active situation features and behavioral manifestations. This is illustrated with a study on selfreported hostile behavior in frustrating situations.According to Bem( 1983 ), the fundamental scientific task for personality research is to convert observations of particular persons behaving in particular ways in particular situations into assertions that certain kinds of persons will behave in certain kinds of ways in certain kinds of situations, that is, to construct triple typologies or equivalence classes--of persons, of behaviors, and of situations--and to fashion theories of personality that relate these equivalence classes to one another. (p. 566) Several authors other than Bern have underscored the importance of studying personality in terms of meaningful patterns of stability and change in well-defined groups of behaviors in relation to well-defined groups of situations (Allport, 1937;Claeys, Timmers, & Phalet, 1993;Golding, 1975;Mischel & Shoda, 1995;Olweus, 1976;Pervin, 1976;Shoda, Mischel, & Wright, 1993Wright & Mischel, 1987). In particular, Wright and Mischel, building on earlier work of Alston (1975), proposed a conditional approach to the study of personality, in which the fundamental unit of observation is not the unconditional probability of behavior but rather the conditional probability of a certain type of behavior given types of situations or psychological conditions. Within this context, differences between (classes of) persons may be conceived as differences in if (situation class) then (behavior class) rules. Wright and Mischel further assumed that the situation category as well as the behavior Kristof Vansteelandt and Iven Van Mechelen, Department of Psychology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.The research reported in this article was supported by North Atlantic Treaty Organization Grant CRG921321. We thank Seymour Rosenberg for his helpful comments on an earlier version of this article.Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Kristof Vansteelandt, Department of Psychology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Tiensestraat 102, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium. Electronic mail may be sent to kristof.vansteelandt @psy.kuleuven.ac.be. category are prototype-based categories with vague boun...

show abstract

Section: Studymentioning

confidence: 99%

Individual differences in situation–behavior profiles: A triple typology model.

Vansteelandt¹,

Mechelen²

1998

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Plusieurs études (Weissman, 1977;Silverman, 1968;Riviera, 1977;Novaro, 1976;Rosenzweig, 1976) au sujet de l'expression de l'agressivité ne différencient aucunement entre celle provoquée par la violation de son espace vital (son self, sa bulle) et exprimée en terme d'affirmation de soi, et l'agressivité débordante de l'impuissant ou de celui qui est dans un état permanent de contrôlé. La personne qui refoule sa colère déborde souvent au moment le plus inapproprié, devenant alors convaincue que sa colère ne doit jamais sortir.…”

Section: Les Handicaps Féminins Dans Le Système De Réciprocitéunclassified

Les femmes et la maladie mentale : un problème culturel?

Lamarre¹

2006

smq

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The goal of this approach is detect recurrent response patterns from this simulated CV idioverse, and emulates the Rosenzweig Picture-Frustration study (P-F), an idiodynamic instrument to assess individual response patterns to frustration (Rosenzweig, 1956(Rosenzweig, , 1978. The P-F evokes distinct response styles across a range of diverse frustrating situations.…”

Section: An Idiodynamic View Of CV Activitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Idiodynamic profiles of cardiovascular activity: A P-technique approach

Friedman

Santucci

2003

Integrative Physiological & Behavioral Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A study was conducted to expand the conventional view of cardiovascular (CV) reactivity by using the idiodynamic paradigm for investigation of individuals. Patterns of autonomic CV regulation were assessed in six subjects across diverse laboratory tasks on three separate occasions. Individual CV profiles were derived from these data with P-technique factor analysis, and then group aggregated with chain P-technique. The composite pattern suggested a three-component solution consisting of cardiac rate, cardiac contractility, and peripheral resistance factors. Individual profiles were compared to the composite pattern; these profiles differed in the number of components derived, percentage variance explained by these components, and relative dominance of specific CV components. A hypothesis that emerged is that the subjects differed in the complexity of CV control. It appears that the idiodynamic framework, combined with novel research designs and statistical methods, may help expand the view of CV reactivity beyond the traditional unitary view as response magnitude.

show abstract

Aggressive behavior and the Rosenzweig Picture-Frustration (P-F) study

Cited by 57 publications

References 14 publications

Individual differences in situation–behavior profiles: A triple typology model.

Individual differences in situation–behavior profiles: A triple typology model.

Les femmes et la maladie mentale : un problème culturel?

Idiodynamic profiles of cardiovascular activity: A P-technique approach

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About