2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00780-015-0273-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aggregation-robustness and model uncertainty of regulatory risk measures

Abstract: Research related to aggregation, robustness, and model uncertainty of regulatory risk measures, for instance, Value-at-Risk (VaR) and Expected Shortfall (ES), is of fundamental importance within quantitative risk management. In risk aggregation, marginal risks and their dependence structure are often modeled separately, leading to uncertainty arising at the level of a joint model. In this paper, we introduce a notion of qualitative robustness for risk measures, concerning the sensitivity of a risk measure to t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
130
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 161 publications
(138 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(46 reference statements)
7
130
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…If β < 1/γ , then P → h dP is, for fixed marginals, Lipschitz in the Wasserstein distance of the copula. Concerning the choice of the risk functional R, we want to point out that the AV@R is aggregation-robust, see Embrechts et al [14], which implies that the AV@R is less sensitive to model uncertainty at the level of the dependence structure than, for instance, the Valueat-Risk. Hence, the AV@R will be of special interest in our subsequent analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If β < 1/γ , then P → h dP is, for fixed marginals, Lipschitz in the Wasserstein distance of the copula. Concerning the choice of the risk functional R, we want to point out that the AV@R is aggregation-robust, see Embrechts et al [14], which implies that the AV@R is less sensitive to model uncertainty at the level of the dependence structure than, for instance, the Valueat-Risk. Hence, the AV@R will be of special interest in our subsequent analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detailed descriptions and the backgrounds of different risk measures can be found in Embrechts et al (2015). In addition to operational risk, this measure has applications in the market risk and credit risk domains (Embrechts and Hofert 2014;Dias 2013;Andersson et al 2001).…”
Section: Background On Value-at-riskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of the research publications which use real-world data in modern QRM rely on proprietary data (Aue and Kalkbrener 2006;OpRisk Advisory and Towers Perrin 2010;Gomes-Gonçalves and Gzyl 2014;Rachev et al 2006;Embrechts et al 2015;Li et al 2014). In some rare cases, the data cited is available only in loss data exchanges where users must pay a fee or donate their own specialized loss data in order to access and analyze the data (Aue and Kalkbrener 2006;Gomes-Gonçalves and Gzyl 2014;Rachev et al 2006;Li et al 2014).…”
Section: Simulated and Real-world Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations