Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing 2005
DOI: 10.1145/1060590.1060692
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aggregating inconsistent information

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
664
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 330 publications
(670 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
664
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bang-Jensen and Thomassen [5] conjectured that FAS is N P-complete even for tournaments. This conjecture was proved independently by at least four groups of researchers [1,2,8,9]. Interestingly, FAS is polynomial time solvable for planar digraphs [4,35] and trivially polynomial time solvable for undirected graphs.…”
Section: Feedback Arc and Vertex Set Problemsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Bang-Jensen and Thomassen [5] conjectured that FAS is N P-complete even for tournaments. This conjecture was proved independently by at least four groups of researchers [1,2,8,9]. Interestingly, FAS is polynomial time solvable for planar digraphs [4,35] and trivially polynomial time solvable for undirected graphs.…”
Section: Feedback Arc and Vertex Set Problemsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Using this lemma it is not difficult to prove that the length of a shortest cycle C in a digraph D of S h is at most n g(n) for some function g(n) = o (1). By Part (ii) of Proposition 3.2, D has a FAS of size at most k if and only if (D+yx)−xy has a FAS of size at most k−1 for at least one arc xy of C. This observation implies an…”
Section: The Minimum Number Of Backward Arcs In An Ordering Of D;mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One of our main results is an elegant iterative compression algorithm for weighted Cluster Vertex Deletion using matching techniques, running in O(2 k k 9 + nm) time. 4 We extend our studies to the (also NP-hard) case where the number of clusters to be generated is limited by a second parameter d. Such studies have also been undertaken for Cluster Editing [19,22,36], but note that for Cluster Editing clearly d ≤ 2k. By way of contrast, since vertex deletion is a stronger operation than edge deletion, in the case of Cluster Vertex Deletion also d > 2k is possible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Cluster Editing is NP-complete; it recently has shown particularly useful for clustering biological data [10,33]. Whereas also a factor-2.5 polynomialtime approximation for Cluster Editing is known [3,4,38], in practical applications fixed-parameter algorithms (combined with some heuristics) providing optimal solutions seem to dominate [5,6,10,33]. For a background on fixed-parameter algorithmics we refer to [12,15,29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%