Aggregate Emissions from the Automobile Population

Heywood, John B.; Martin, Michael K.

doi:10.4271/740536

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…European vehicles compare with the pre-catalyst technology with deterioration factors more typically in the range 1.1 to 1.8; see OECD (3). Note that NOx deterioration is slight, much less than that for HC and CO. Heywood & Martin (8) have derived values for the deterioration by age which are applied to rework ECE 15.03 to an approximate 5 year (80 10-^ km) level, this is an extrapolation to ECE 15 vehicles from US practice on the basis of pre-catalyst technology. The emission rates are then for HC, CO, and NOx; 2.25, 30.1, 2.75 g.km"* respectively.…”

Section: Some Comparative Features Ece 1503 and Us Cvs-c/h For 1979mentioning

confidence: 99%

Some derived vehicle emission rates‐a study of ECE 15 test cycle related exhaust emissions

Rice¹

1983

Environmental Technology Letters

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The ECE 15 automotive emission control standards are reworked to derive vehicle emission rates (g.km -1 ) for HC, CO and NOx emissions in a manner that is consistent with US EPA CVS-C/H exhaust emission standards. Various technical and empirical factors in the US EPA program are reworked to the ECE 15 basis and used to derive and assess the emission rates for vehicles for British fuel quality and operating conditions. This is extended to cover diesel engine emission rates for HC, CO and NOx emission. Tabulated adjusted emission rates are given for use directly in environmental studies of UK urban road traffic conditions.

show abstract

Section: Some Comparative Features Ece 1503 and Us Cvs-c/h For 1979mentioning

confidence: 99%

Some derived vehicle emission rates‐a study of ECE 15 test cycle related exhaust emissions

Rice¹

1983

Environmental Technology Letters

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Thus, (13) Since Cb is directly proportional to the battery cost ($/kWh) and inversely proportional to durability (cycle life) as illustrated in the following section, the battery cost requirement can be expressed as Battery Cost ($/kWh) < (14) where, K = constant relating to the energy consumption of the electric vehicle and the depth-of-discharge of the battery power source.…”

Section: Durability and Cost Requirementsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Electrochemical Power for Transportation

Cairns

Hietbrink

1981

Comprehensive Treatise of Electrochemistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…9 ' 10 Depending on the varying degrees of control, for some model years the evaporative hydrocarbon emissions may account for nearly one-half of the hydrocarbon mass being emitted from the automobile. Throughout this presentation, reference to evaporation emissions will include only those emissions associated directly with the vehicle and not those associated with refueling.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%