2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00168-014-0625-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Agglomeration and regional growth policy: externalities versus comparative advantages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The concept of clusters was developed by economic geographers and economists to understand local industrial agglomeration and specialization and for policy-makers to design appropriate interventions (Cruz & Teixeira, 2010;Delgado, Porter, & Stern, 2014). Previous research examined the relationships between industrial clustering and corporate growth (Duschl, Scholl, Brenner, Luxen, & Raschke, 2015), and clusters and regional growth policies (Pessoa, 2014), and the dynamics of cluster evolution (Boschma & Fornahl, 2011). Increasingly, scholars and policymakers have begun to recognise the value of multi-industry clusters (Aranguren, Maza-Aramburu, Parrilli, Vendrell-Herrero, & Wilson, 2014;Boix, Hervás-Oliver, & Miguel-Molina, 2015; Dei Ottati, 2018).…”
Section: Government Policies and Multi-industry Clustersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of clusters was developed by economic geographers and economists to understand local industrial agglomeration and specialization and for policy-makers to design appropriate interventions (Cruz & Teixeira, 2010;Delgado, Porter, & Stern, 2014). Previous research examined the relationships between industrial clustering and corporate growth (Duschl, Scholl, Brenner, Luxen, & Raschke, 2015), and clusters and regional growth policies (Pessoa, 2014), and the dynamics of cluster evolution (Boschma & Fornahl, 2011). Increasingly, scholars and policymakers have begun to recognise the value of multi-industry clusters (Aranguren, Maza-Aramburu, Parrilli, Vendrell-Herrero, & Wilson, 2014;Boix, Hervás-Oliver, & Miguel-Molina, 2015; Dei Ottati, 2018).…”
Section: Government Policies and Multi-industry Clustersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Positive, negative and insignificant impacts of three types of externalities were found in those studies. 2 Recent examples of such studies include de Groot and de Vor (2010) and Pessoa (2014). However, up to now there is very limited literature on Ukrainian enterprises that is based on firm-level data to study determinants of productivity.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Synthetizing different contributions, Duranton and Puga (2004) and Puga (2010) identify three main micro-foundations: (i) sharing of facilities, and gains from individual specialization and variety, and risk sharing, through labor pooling; (ii) higher probability of a matching, with higher quality; and (iii) learning, related to knowledge generation, diffusion, and accumulation. These externalities are static when they explain the cross-sectional distribution of economic activity, and are dynamic when related to productivity growth and knowledge spillovers (De Groot et al, 2009;Pessoa, 2014). According to Rosenthal and Strange (2004) they may be related to the city size (urbanization economies, associated to Jacobian economies) or to the size of the own economic sector (localization economies, linked to Marshallian economies).…”
Section: Principles Of Agglomeration Economiesmentioning
confidence: 99%