1997
DOI: 10.1086/304987
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ages of Globular Clusters fromHIPPARCOSParallaxes of Local Subdwarfs

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

47
353
2
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 300 publications
(404 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
47
353
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…All of these are roughly 2-3 Gyr younger than previous estimates, due in part to the new longer distance scale suggested by Hipparcos, and also due to improved input physics in the models. 12 ± 1 main sequence fitting (post Hipparcos) [23] 11.8 ± 1.2 main sequence fitting (post Hipparcos) [25] 12 ± 1 Theoretical HB models, main sequence fitting (post H.) [27] 12.2 ± 1.8 Theoretical HB models [28] Where do we go from here? The results of recent years suggest younger ages than previously determined for globular clusters, and also give us more reliable estimates of the uncertainties in the presumed ages, just as David would have liked.…”
Section: Combined Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All of these are roughly 2-3 Gyr younger than previous estimates, due in part to the new longer distance scale suggested by Hipparcos, and also due to improved input physics in the models. 12 ± 1 main sequence fitting (post Hipparcos) [23] 11.8 ± 1.2 main sequence fitting (post Hipparcos) [25] 12 ± 1 Theoretical HB models, main sequence fitting (post H.) [27] 12.2 ± 1.8 Theoretical HB models [28] Where do we go from here? The results of recent years suggest younger ages than previously determined for globular clusters, and also give us more reliable estimates of the uncertainties in the presumed ages, just as David would have liked.…”
Section: Combined Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In any case, the excitement over the Hipparcos results has caused a number of groups to determine distances to globular clusters on the basis of main sequence fitting [23][24][25]3]. Care must be taken to isolate those stars with low metallicity, and also to remove possible binary systems from the analysis [3].…”
Section: Main Sequence Fittingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…l and b are the Galactic longitude and latitude of the clusters; the symbol μ 0 indicates the true distance modulus of the cluster. References: (1) Gratton et al (1997); (2) Harris (2010); (3) Brasseur et al (2010); (4) Hodder et al (1992); (5) Sarajedini, Dotter, & Kirkpatrick (2009); (6) Hog & Flynn (1998); (7) Anthony-Twarog, Twarog, & Mayer (2007); (8) Sandage, Lubin, & VandenBerg (2003). [M/H] is the estimated error on the metallicity, for each set of derived T eff , log g and [M/H].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In perspective, most accurate and robust distances (error < 2%) for a few GCs will be obtained using geometrical methods , an area where also FLAMES plays a crucial role (allowing fast determination of radial velocities for a wide number of stars). However, at present, distances with errors of 3-5% can be obtained for a larger sample of GCs using the Main Sequence Fitting Method (MSFM), exploiting local subdwarfs as standard candles (see Gratton et al 1997;Pont et al 1998;Carretta et al 2000;Gratton et al 2003). Main sources of errors in MSFM are possible systematic differences in reddenings and metallicities between field and GC stars.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%