2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(00)00940-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Agents, biomarkers, and cohorts for chemopreventive agent development in prostate cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that amphipathic-L did not inhibit PSA synthesis, suggesting that the reduction in the PSA level was probably due to the reduction in tumor size. Therefore, prolonged treatment with amphipathic-D is not likely to interfere with the validity of PSA as an indicator of prostate carcinoma progression, in contrast to other drugs, such as antiandrogen or antiestrogen chemotherapeutics (42).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that amphipathic-L did not inhibit PSA synthesis, suggesting that the reduction in the PSA level was probably due to the reduction in tumor size. Therefore, prolonged treatment with amphipathic-D is not likely to interfere with the validity of PSA as an indicator of prostate carcinoma progression, in contrast to other drugs, such as antiandrogen or antiestrogen chemotherapeutics (42).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since almost all rat mammary tumors are estrogen dependent, these tumors generally respond to agents that interrupt estrogensignaling pathways (Nandi et al, 1995). However, estrogen is not the only factor that affects human breast cancer development (Kelloff et al, 1998). Unlike rat mammary tumors and like a significant portion of human breast cancer, mouse mammary tumors are less estrogen dependent.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One possible explanation for the discrepancy between the results obtained in animal studies and the results of pilot clinical trials may be related to the insufficient dose used in humans (44,58). In vitro, the induction of apoptosis by 4-HPR is evident at higher concentrations than those achieved in vivo at the oral dose 200 mg/d (12).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%