2011
DOI: 10.1080/01969722.2011.595332
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Agent-Based Modeling and Analysis of Socio-Technical Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We report in Tables 1-3 a characterization of all the variables which are represented in an agent, and which influence the evolution of the simulated ATM system. The metrics built on top of these aspects (as discussed in Section IV-E) will allow to establish a characterization of the ATM sociotechnical system [27].…”
Section: Agent-based Atm Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We report in Tables 1-3 a characterization of all the variables which are represented in an agent, and which influence the evolution of the simulated ATM system. The metrics built on top of these aspects (as discussed in Section IV-E) will allow to establish a characterization of the ATM sociotechnical system [27].…”
Section: Agent-based Atm Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TTL has proven to be a suitable formal language for the specification of agent-based models of complex sociotechnical systems (Bosse et al 2009;Sharpanskykh and Stroeve 2011;Sharpanskykh 2011). TTL is a variant of an order-sorted predicate logic (Manzano and Manzano 1996).…”
Section: Formal Modeling Languagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cognitive specifications are particularly suitable to describe the dynamics of a proactive agent with reasoning capabilities about the environment, the formal organization, and its own states. Cognitive specifications may describe a great variety of human processes, e.g., perception, decision making (Sharpanskykh & Zia, 2012), attention management, trust (Sharpanskykh, 2011), workload.…”
Section: An Agent-based Multi-level Safety Analysis Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%