Agenda-setting by the European Commission. Seeking public opinion?

Haverland, Markus; Ruiter, Minou de; Walle, Steven Van de

doi:10.1080/13501763.2016.1249014

Cited by 44 publications

(42 citation statements)

References 30 publications

(23 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…More generally, it also questions in how far polls initiated by policy-makers provide unbiased measures of public opinion. Especially the Eurobarometer polls contracted by the European Commission have recently been rather interpreted as strategic tools to influence the public discourse (Haverland et al 2018;Höpner and Jurczyk 2015).…”

Section: A Procedural Perspective On Responsiveness In Eu Policymakingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Going full circle: the need for procedural perspectives on EU responsiveness

Wilde

Rauh

2019

Journal of European Public Policy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Research on policy responsiveness of the European Union has adopted the systemic model from national contexts. This focusses on the static congruence or the dynamic adaptation of aggregated policy output and similarly aggregated public opinion. Approaches in this vein provide relevant insights and uncover a surprising degree of EU responsiveness. Yet, this debate contribution argues that they only insufficiently capture indirect accountability chains and the emerging challenges of public EU politicization and mediatization. We establish the need for procedural perspectives that addresses how the different EU institutions perceive and digest public opinion and subsequently influence it through communication. To further this research agenda, we sketch the contours of a procedural model by highlighting possible variation at the input, throughput and output stages. Going full circle, we suggest, allows us to better understand the responses to public opinion and their wider implications for the societal acceptance of the unfinished supranational polity.

show abstract

Section: A Procedural Perspective On Responsiveness In Eu Policymakingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Going full circle: the need for procedural perspectives on EU responsiveness

Wilde

Rauh

2019

Journal of European Public Policy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Early in the policy cycle, the Commission can act as an informal agenda-setter or policy entrepreneur, e.g. by creating judicial precedents (Schmidt, 2000), strategic information collection (Haverland et al, 2018), or by setting up expert groups, initiating stakeholder consultations, or issuing discussion papers (Princen and Rhinard, 2006).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

One agenda-setter or many? The varying success of policy initiatives by individual Directorates-General of the European Commission 1994–2016

Rauh

2020

European Union Politics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Analyses of strategic agenda-setting in the European Union treat the European Commission as a unitary actor with perfect information. Yet, the constraints for correctly anticipating acceptable policies vary heavily across its individual Directorates-General. Do these internal rifts affect the Commission’s agenda-setting ability? This article tests corresponding expectations on the edit distances between 2237 Commission proposals and the adopted laws across 23 years. The quality of legislative anticipation indeed varies with the responsible Directorate-General. Legislative proposals are more likely to remain unchanged if they face less parliamentary involvement, are less complex, were drafted by an experienced Directorate-General, and were coordinated more seamlessly within the Commission. However, the uncovered variation also calls for more systematic research on the distribution of legislative capacities inside the Commission.

show abstract

“…For the variety of ways through which questions make it into the Eurobarometer surveys, see Haverland et al. ().…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

The opinion‐policy nexus in Europe and the role of political institutions

Rasmussen

Reher

Toshkov

2018

European J Political Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract.A strong link between citizen preferences and public policy is one of the key goals and criteria of democratic governance. Yet, our knowledge about the extent to which public policies on specific issues are in line with citizen preferences in Europe is limited. This article reports on the first study of the link between public opinion and public policy that covers a large and diverse sample of concrete public policy issues in 31 European democracies. The findings demonstrate a strong positive relationship and a substantial degree of congruence between public opinion and the state of public policy. Also examined is whether political institutions, including electoral systems and the horizontal and vertical division of powers, influence the opinion-policy link. The evidence for such effects is very limited, which suggests that the same institutions might affect policy representation in countervailing ways through different mechanisms.

show abstract

Agenda-setting by the European Commission. Seeking public opinion?

Cited by 44 publications

References 30 publications

Going full circle: the need for procedural perspectives on EU responsiveness

Going full circle: the need for procedural perspectives on EU responsiveness

One agenda-setter or many? The varying success of policy initiatives by individual Directorates-General of the European Commission 1994–2016

The opinion‐policy nexus in Europe and the role of political institutions

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About