This is the accepted version of the paper.This version of the publication may differ from the final published version.
Permanent repository link
ABSTRACT:Armed with readily accessible online traffic logs that provide detailed information about the items users are selecting to view, editors are voicing concern about the potential effect on their own content decisions. Through a survey of local British newspaper editors, this article examines the overlap between user preferences, as suggested by assessments of website traffic, and content that editors identify as their best. Results are considered in the context of two related subsets of agenda-setting theory, as well as the sociological process of "making news." The study finds overlap between broad categories of stories preferred by editors and users, but a considerable disconnect over the nature of the items within those categories.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:The author gratefully thanks an anonymous reviewer on an AEJMC conference paper version of this manuscript for the apt "agenda overlap" suggestion, as well as the journal manuscript reviewers for their useful feedback.