2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7063(01)00084-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Agency effects and escalation of commitment: do small national culture differences matter?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Sharp and Salter (1997) find that the agency effect (adverse selection situations) was insignificant for their Asian sample (Hong Kong and Singapore), yet highly significant in North America (U.S. and Canada). In addition, Salter and Sharp (2001) find a strong effect of national culture, given an apparently small culture difference (i.e., U.S.A. and Canada), on how well agency theory can explain managersÕ project continuance decisions. Therefore, they suggest that the effect of adverse selection conditions may be highly country-specific.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, Sharp and Salter (1997) find that the agency effect (adverse selection situations) was insignificant for their Asian sample (Hong Kong and Singapore), yet highly significant in North America (U.S. and Canada). In addition, Salter and Sharp (2001) find a strong effect of national culture, given an apparently small culture difference (i.e., U.S.A. and Canada), on how well agency theory can explain managersÕ project continuance decisions. Therefore, they suggest that the effect of adverse selection conditions may be highly country-specific.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Cross-cultural studies in management accounting suggest that national culture may affect the design and the use of management control systems, managersÕ values, and their decision making (e.g., Chow et al, 2000). Some studies find that the national cultures of managers within multinational companies may affect such managersÕ project continuation decisions (Chow et al, 1997;Salter and Sharp, 2001;Sharp and Salter, 1997). For example, Sharp and Salter (1997) find that the agency effect (adverse selection situations) was insignificant for their Asian sample (Hong Kong and Singapore), yet highly significant in North America (U.S. and Canada).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, escalation in the IT sector can be related to an organizational reward structure in which a manager's performance is linked with the success of software process improvement activities (Abrahamsson, 2002). Salter and Sharp (2001) showed that the effect of an apparently small difference in national culture can explain differences in escalation of commitment to failing projects in two countries with significant cross-border investment (USA and Canada). Studies of de-escalation of commitment (Heng et al, 2003;Pan et al, 2004) can provide guidance for both researchers and managers to help avoid inappropriate escalation of commitment.…”
Section: An Institutional Perspective On Tools For Sustainable Forestrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study of local subsidiaries of a multinational corporation demonstrates the influence of nationally specific corporate policies and practices in relation to the environment (Guedes 2000). Salter and Sharp (2001) show that even apparently minor cultural differences in management control and accounting such as those between Canada and the United States can be the source of serious coordination problems. Other studies address the importance of nationality in behavioural attributes of executives (Hitt 1997), entrepreneurial orientation (Kemelgor 2002), and investment conduct (Thomas and Waring 1999).…”
Section: National Culture In Business Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%