Agency and Resilience: Teachings of Pikangikum First Nation Elders, Northwestern Ontario

Abstract

ABSTRACT. Although scholars of social-ecological resilience propose unity between humans and the natural world, much of this work remains based on Cartesian division of mind and body that denies it. We present an example of a unified system of resilience thinking shared with us by Anishinaabe (Ojibway) elders of Pikangikum First Nation, northwestern Ontario. The elders' views of boreal forest disturbance and renewal are distinct from western scientific approaches in their recognition of agency, the ability to individually express free will in nonhuman beings including animals, plants, rocks, and forest fire within their landscape. Pikangikum elders perceive that, if relationships based on respect, reciprocity, and noninterference are maintained with other agents, renewal will continue. The proposition of living landscapes composed of diverse nonhuman agents poses challenges to collaboration with western worldviews, which view nature largely as mechanistic and without moral standing. We suggest that a greater attention to nonwestern ontologies can contribute to productive cross-cultural partnerships directed toward fostering resilience.

Łeghágots'enetę (learning together): the importance of indigenous perspectives in the identification of biological variation

“…This is partially due to the fact that what must be obligatorily expressed in one language need not be obligatorily expressed in another, and thus the structure of the language can implicitly and explicitly affect how speakers engage with the world and influence memory, perception, and categorization (Markman and Hutchinson 1984, Harrison 2007, Deutscher 2010, Boroditsky 2011. Indigenous languages can provide refined and multifaceted descriptions of biodiversity (Hale et al 1992, Newmaster et al 2007), alternative ways of examining and relating to nonhuman animals (Ingold 2011, Miller andDavidson-Hunt 2013), and insight into the underlying processes that create biological structure and drive patterns of biodiversity (Ragupathy et al 2009, Gavin et al 2015.…”

Framing Indigenous Bioenergy Partnerships

“…Social Framing: Making Sense of Collaboration and Conflict Understanding identities, issues, roles, and responsibilities is integral to understanding environmental governance systems that are inclusive of Indigenous Peoples (Corntassel, 2012;Miller & Davidson-Hunt, 2013). We use Kooiman's (2003) definition of governance as "the totality of interactions, in which public as well as private sectors participate, aimed at solving societal problems or creating societal opportunities" (p. 4).…”

Growing together: A principle-based approach to building collaborative Indigenous partnerships in Canada’s forest sector

“…As Natcher et al (2005) contend, non-First Nations often demonstrate individualistic behaviour, valuing economics over the cultural consequences of forest resource development. Conversely, studies conducted in partnership with First Nations from across Canada have clearly demonstrated that Indigenous peoples throughout the country view themselves as partners in sacred relationships with the natural world, which must be maintained through respect, reciprocity and cultural protocols (e.g., Miller and Davidson-Hunt 2013). As a result of such differences in worldviews, each group will ultimately view acceptable harvesting practices in fundamentally different ways (Parsons and Prest 2003).…”

“…Miller and Davidson-Hunt (2013) for example, have acknowledged that the worldviews of Indigenous youth may vary considerably from older generations. Stevenson (2006) has echoed this insight, observing that the use of the term "conservation" is much more prevalent among Indigenous youth than it is among Elders.…”