2010
DOI: 10.24885/sab.v23i1.285
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Agency and politics in hunter-gatherer territory formation

Abstract: Discussions of territoriality in prehistory that link ownership, exclusion, and privilege to the development of complex social systems are seldom relevant for explaining hunter-gatherer territorial organization. It is necessary, therefore, to address huntergatherer territoriality from a perspective that is uniquely tailored to their land use patterns, social networks, and political agencies. By building a model of territory formation that explicitly incorporates mobility and other key aspects of hunter-gathere… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
7

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
2
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…However, along the southern Alberta-Montana foothills, the high density of surface stone features and bone beds on primary and secondary watersheds indicates that this landscape was colonized and entrenched by people who shared a cultural logic and a distinctive tradition of landscape engineering. This time-averaged archaeological record was cumulatively shaped through persistence or place reuse and repeated movement across pathways that connected sacred sites, living areas, resource locales, and other meaningful places (Dooley 2004;Oetelaar 2006;Oetelaar and Meyer 2006;Zedeño and Anderson 2010). Movement, in turn, reified tradition and at the same time expressed rising processes of differentiation.…”
Section: Toward a New Vision Of Pedestrian Big-game Huntersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, along the southern Alberta-Montana foothills, the high density of surface stone features and bone beds on primary and secondary watersheds indicates that this landscape was colonized and entrenched by people who shared a cultural logic and a distinctive tradition of landscape engineering. This time-averaged archaeological record was cumulatively shaped through persistence or place reuse and repeated movement across pathways that connected sacred sites, living areas, resource locales, and other meaningful places (Dooley 2004;Oetelaar 2006;Oetelaar and Meyer 2006;Zedeño and Anderson 2010). Movement, in turn, reified tradition and at the same time expressed rising processes of differentiation.…”
Section: Toward a New Vision Of Pedestrian Big-game Huntersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existe abundante bibliografía arqueológica y etnográfica sobre territorialidad en grupos cazadores-recolectores (e.g. Peterson, 1975;Dyson-Hudson y Smith, 1978;Layton, 1986;Barnard, 1992;Hitchcok y Bartram, 1998;Zedeño, 1997Zedeño, , 2008Zedeño y Anderson, 2010). En este trabajo, retomamos la propuesta elaborada por Zedeño (1997Zedeño ( , 2008 y Zedeño y Anderson (2010) quienes definen territorialidad como la suma de acciones, emociones yagregamos-concepciones (ideas, valores, saberes), sobre un espacio específico -con énfasis en su control y acceso diferencial 3 -que se materializan en la conformación de un territorio.…”
Section: Arte Rupestre Y Territorialidadunclassified
“…En este trabajo, retomamos la propuesta elaborada por Zedeño (1997Zedeño ( , 2008 y Zedeño y Anderson (2010) quienes definen territorialidad como la suma de acciones, emociones yagregamos-concepciones (ideas, valores, saberes), sobre un espacio específico -con énfasis en su control y acceso diferencial 3 -que se materializan en la conformación de un territorio. Un territorio es un espacio delimitado social, económica, política y simbólicamente, a partir de dichas acciones, emociones y concepciones, que incluyen rasgos topográficos, recursos naturales y manufacturas humanas (Zedeño, 1997(Zedeño, , 2008Zedeño y Anderson, 2010).…”
Section: Arte Rupestre Y Territorialidadunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Within mobile societies, these changes may subsequently place different values on variables required for habitation, as well as the timing and frequency of movements (Binford 1982). Because the principles organizing a group's relationship to the landscape may differ significantly cross-culturally, we can address models of settlement and mobility from a perspective that is “uniquely tailored to their land use patterns, social networks, and political agencies” (Zedeño and Anderson 2010:10).…”
Section: Blackfoot Land Use Systems From the Precontact To The Contacmentioning
confidence: 99%