2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.orcp.2011.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ageing, adiposity indexes and low muscle mass in a clinical sample of overweight and obese women

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…BIVA analyzes electrical properties of tissues and is sensitive to changes of body cell mass and hydration;14,15 specific BIVA17 has been shown to accurately evaluate the relative amounts of fat and FFM, so it is probably sensitive to skeletal muscle fat infiltration and inflammatory states. According to Siervo et al,29 BMI and WC showed the worst performance when classifying sarcopenic obesity in a large sample of women. Moreover, the visceral fat distribution detected by WC is a dimorphic character more pronounced in men than in women; in fact, even though in the present research WC showed significant differences between sarcopenic and sarcopenic obese men (Table 2), in women the correlation of WC with FM% (r: 0.42, p < 0.01) was lower than the correlation between R sp and FM% (r: 0.62, p > 0.01).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BIVA analyzes electrical properties of tissues and is sensitive to changes of body cell mass and hydration;14,15 specific BIVA17 has been shown to accurately evaluate the relative amounts of fat and FFM, so it is probably sensitive to skeletal muscle fat infiltration and inflammatory states. According to Siervo et al,29 BMI and WC showed the worst performance when classifying sarcopenic obesity in a large sample of women. Moreover, the visceral fat distribution detected by WC is a dimorphic character more pronounced in men than in women; in fact, even though in the present research WC showed significant differences between sarcopenic and sarcopenic obese men (Table 2), in women the correlation of WC with FM% (r: 0.42, p < 0.01) was lower than the correlation between R sp and FM% (r: 0.62, p > 0.01).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Waist circumference (WC) was measured at the midpoint between the last rib and the iliac crest on the midaxillary line. 25 Mid-upper-arm circumference was measured on the nondominant side at the midpoint between the tip of the acromial process of the scapula and the olecranon process of the ulna. Triceps skin-fold thickness was used to estimate MM according to the algorithm: (arm-muscle area [AMA] = [AC − {π × triceps skin fold}]) 2 /4π.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FM and FFM were adjusted for height squared to account for age-related differences in height, and called FM index (FMI) and FFM index, respectively. 25 29 Obesity was evaluated using established clinical and research cutoff scores for BMI, WC, FM%, and FMI. The cutoff scores for the classification of obesity included 1) BMI ≥30.0 kg/m 2 , 2) WC >88.0 cm, 3) FM% ≥35.0%, and 4) FMI ≥9.5 kg/m 2 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Full description of the study methodology is defined elsewhere . In brief, participants were selected from those recruited between February 2010 and September 2013 as part of a large ongoing cohort (Milan), followed at the International Center for the Assessment of Nutritional Status (ICANS, University of Milan).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sarcopenic obesity has been defined using different parameters as indicators of sarcopenia, obesity, body composition techniques and diagnostic cut‐offs . Body mass index (BMI) , waist circumference (WC) , FM % , fat mass index (FMI) and visceral fat area have all been used as parameters to define obesity, while appendicular skeletal muscle mass , skeletal mass index , skeletal muscle mass percentage , FFM index (FFMI) and thigh muscle cross‐sectional area have all been parameters used to define sarcopenia. The cut‐off values used for each of these parameters have differed between studies and have been gender‐specific , cohort‐specific or derived from a reference young healthy population .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%