2009 IEEE International Advance Computing Conference 2009
DOI: 10.1109/iadcc.2009.4809068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ageing Adaptation for Multimodal Biometrics using Adaptive Feature Set Update Algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this problem is solved by letting the user train the classifier with a reasonable amount of trials at the beginning (5 training trials gives an EER of 14.81%, as shown in the last row of Table 2) and use every subsequent authentication attempt that results in a successful login as an extra training trial. After having a robust set of training trials, an aging factor, as considered in [18], can also be introduced in which the oldest trials are weighted less and every new successful authentication attempt is taken as a new training trial. Thus the system would be adapting to the constant changes of the users and their environment.…”
Section: Implications and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this problem is solved by letting the user train the classifier with a reasonable amount of trials at the beginning (5 training trials gives an EER of 14.81%, as shown in the last row of Table 2) and use every subsequent authentication attempt that results in a successful login as an extra training trial. After having a robust set of training trials, an aging factor, as considered in [18], can also be introduced in which the oldest trials are weighted less and every new successful authentication attempt is taken as a new training trial. Thus the system would be adapting to the constant changes of the users and their environment.…”
Section: Implications and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only condition for taking part in the evaluation was age (over 16 years old as it was demonstrated that the handwritten signature is not stable in children [23]). There were 54 right-handed and 2 left-handed.…”
Section: Evaluation Crewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Otherwise, the system will show attenuating fusion. We are motivated by [3,4] to develop a bimodal biometric system that is more robust to environmental and sensor noise. Figure 1 shows the overall block diagram of the score level fusion strategy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%