2014
DOI: 10.1080/00288330.2013.875928
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age validation, growth and population characteristics of greenback flounder (Rhombosolea tapirina) in a large temperate estuary

Abstract: The greenback flounder (Rhombosolea tapirina) is an important fishery species in southern Australia and New Zealand, whose demographic processes are poorly understood. This study developed an ageing protocol based on otolith interpretation and provided estimates of age-based data for an exploited population in the estuary of Australia's largest river system. The otoliths fulfilled three criteria that established their usefulness for ageing. Estimates of size and age were used to generate von Bertalanffy growth… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All flounder captured in this study were small young-of-the-year (all < 100 mm, which is less than 2-year-old flounder (Webb 1972)), suggesting that Duvauchelle Bay serves as an important nursery ground, especially given the abundance of food (e.g., shrimp) and habitat complexity. However, whether this pattern can be directly attributed to the seagrass is uncertain, because juvenile flounder did not show a strong preference for patchy or dense seagrass and are often also found on mudflats (Webb 1972;Earl et al 2014;Thomsen et al 2020). Additionally, our sampling method targets small fishes across small spatial scales, so the occupancy of the seagrass by adults is unknown.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…All flounder captured in this study were small young-of-the-year (all < 100 mm, which is less than 2-year-old flounder (Webb 1972)), suggesting that Duvauchelle Bay serves as an important nursery ground, especially given the abundance of food (e.g., shrimp) and habitat complexity. However, whether this pattern can be directly attributed to the seagrass is uncertain, because juvenile flounder did not show a strong preference for patchy or dense seagrass and are often also found on mudflats (Webb 1972;Earl et al 2014;Thomsen et al 2020). Additionally, our sampling method targets small fishes across small spatial scales, so the occupancy of the seagrass by adults is unknown.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As with the shrimp data, we modelled counts predicted by seagrass cover, season, and size class (≤ 10 mm, 10-20 mm, 20-50 mm, > 50 mm). All four size classes are considered juveniles as we did not catch any fish > 15 cm (Earl et al 2014). To assess the fit of the model, we visualised the residuals compared to each variable in the model to ensure residuals were centred around 0 and calculated the dispersion statistic as the Σ(residuals 2 )∕(N − p − 1) , where N is the number of individuals and p is the number of parameters (including interaction coefficients).…”
Section: Population Dynamics Of Focal Taxamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this species, age was determined by the otolith surface‐reading (Kayano, 2012) and section (Iino et al, 2021; Tawaratsumida et al, 2019) methods, and a comparison of these reports indicates that the maximum age of the surface‐reading method was lower than that of the section method. The surface‐reading method has been reported to underestimate the age of older fish in several coastal fishes, such as fat greenling, Hexagrammos otakii (Sekigawa et al, 2002); rockfish, Sebastes vulpes (Sekigawa et al, 2003); tonguefish, Cynoglossus abbreviates (Yamamoto et al, 2008); and greenback flounder, Phombosolea tapirina (Earl et al, 2014). In addition, the number of opaque zones in cultured fish determined by the section method was consistent with age, suggesting that this method is accurate (Iino et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%