2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age-related neural dedifferentiation and cognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

15
49
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
15
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The univariate and pattern similarity measures yielded convergent results indicating that scene-, but not face-selective, regions demonstrated reduced category-level selectivity with older age -that is, age-related neural dedifferentiation. The findings add to the already large literature describing age-related neural dedifferentiation effects (for review, see Koen et al, , 2020 and, importantly, also add to evidence suggesting that while the phenomenon is highly robust for scene stimuli, it is more elusive for other stimulus classes: faces in the present case, and objects in . Additionally, analogous to the findings of , the univariate metric of neural differentiation for scenes in the PPA demonstrated a positive, ageinvariant, relationship with source memory performance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The univariate and pattern similarity measures yielded convergent results indicating that scene-, but not face-selective, regions demonstrated reduced category-level selectivity with older age -that is, age-related neural dedifferentiation. The findings add to the already large literature describing age-related neural dedifferentiation effects (for review, see Koen et al, , 2020 and, importantly, also add to evidence suggesting that while the phenomenon is highly robust for scene stimuli, it is more elusive for other stimulus classes: faces in the present case, and objects in . Additionally, analogous to the findings of , the univariate metric of neural differentiation for scenes in the PPA demonstrated a positive, ageinvariant, relationship with source memory performance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Increasing age has been reported to be associated with reduced specificity and distinctiveness of neural representations, a phenomenon known as age-related neural dedifferentiation (for review, see Koen et al, , 2020. Computational models of cognitive aging suggest that neural dedifferentiation plays a role in age-related cognitive decline (Li et al, 2001;Li & Rieckmann, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…selectivity and category specificity remained significant (r = 0.37, p = .003), whereas partial correlations of item specificity to category selectivity (r = 0.14, p = .276) and category specificity (r = 0.17, p = .176) were not significant. These results underline previous theoretical distinctions between distinctiveness measures on category and item Koen et al, 2020) and furthermore emphasize the close relationship between both dedifferentiation measures on category level . Age and performance differences in occipital item specificity are driven by item stability Our linear mixed model analysis revealed that differences in item specificity account for interindividual differences in memory performance over and above the variance explained by all variables combined.…”
Section: Linking Neural Dedifferentiation Across Representational Levsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In sum, there is a clear tension between model-derived predictions for neural dedifferentiation and available empirical support. While many studies provided coherent evidence for neural dedifferentiation with age at the category level (for reviews, see Koen et al, 2020), they did not directly test a central tenet of computational models of dedifferentiation (Li and Sikström, 2002;Li et al, 2000Li et al, , 2001, namely reduced distinctiveness of single-item representations. Thus, whether age differences exist at the level of item representations is an ongoing debate in the field based on highly limited evidence (see e.g., .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%