2008
DOI: 10.3129/i08-001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age-related macular degeneration and low-vision rehabilitation: a systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
268
0
5

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 343 publications
(276 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
3
268
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…They reduced the final question to a yes or no answer, resulting in a maximal total score of 28. Quality categories were defined as 26-28 = excellent, 20-25 = good, 15-19 = fair and below 14 = poor (Benjamin, van de Water, & Peiris, 2014;Hooper, Jutai, Strong, & Russsel-Minda, 2008). Scores were calculated by the author and physiotherapist NH (Tables 3 and 4).…”
Section: Non-randomized Trials -Downs and Black Checklistmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They reduced the final question to a yes or no answer, resulting in a maximal total score of 28. Quality categories were defined as 26-28 = excellent, 20-25 = good, 15-19 = fair and below 14 = poor (Benjamin, van de Water, & Peiris, 2014;Hooper, Jutai, Strong, & Russsel-Minda, 2008). Scores were calculated by the author and physiotherapist NH (Tables 3 and 4).…”
Section: Non-randomized Trials -Downs and Black Checklistmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the external validity subscales, the general population was considered to be that of the hospital/specialist treating adults with spinal deformity; thus, the participants in these studies are representative of that population. The tool was modified for use in this review, as in previous reviews, regarding scoring the question concerning statistical power to 1 if a power or sample size calculation was present and 0 if no power or sample size calculation was present [18][19][20][21]. The Downs and Black scores are divided into four quality categories: excellent (26)(27)(28), good (20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25), fair (15)(16)(17)(18)(19), and poor (B14); only a randomized control trial can obtain the top score of 28 [20,21].…”
Section: Critical Appraisalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…64 A 6-week 12-hour AMD cognitive education program has been seen to lower the incidence of depression, reduce the severity of symptoms among depressed patients, increase self-efficacy, and improve self-reported visual function. [65][66][67][68] Undertaking routine low vision rehabilitation can improve adjustment to vision loss, 69 as can teaching functional living skills including orientation and mobility training and occupational therapy for at least 4 weeks.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%