2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-13346-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age-related differences in the survival benefit of the administration of antithrombin, recombinant human thrombomodulin, or their combination in sepsis

Abstract: Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) is one of the major organ dysfunctions associated with sepsis. This retrospective secondary analysis comprised data from a prospective multicenter study to investigate the age-related differences in the survival benefit of anticoagulant therapy in sepsis according to the DIC diagnostic criteria. Adult patients with severe sepsis based on the Sepsis-2 criteria were enrolled and divided into the following groups: (1) anticoagulant group (patients who received anticoag… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

6
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, these results do not indicate that antithrombin administration in trauma patients has no therapeutic efficacy. The importance of correctly identifying an optimal patient population with sepsis that can benefit from anticoagulant therapy has been repeatedly reported (40)(41)(42)(43); consequently, we suggest that for trauma patients it is necessary to clarify the type of bleeding (simple type hemorrhage or oozing type hemorrhage), the type of coagulation changes (DIC or not), and when antithrombin should be administered (acute phase or sub-acute phase) to effectively identify target patients that can benefit from antithrombin administration. The results of this study provide important evidence that forms the basis for undertaking randomized controlled trials to test the efficacy of antithrombin correction in trauma-induced DIC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, these results do not indicate that antithrombin administration in trauma patients has no therapeutic efficacy. The importance of correctly identifying an optimal patient population with sepsis that can benefit from anticoagulant therapy has been repeatedly reported (40)(41)(42)(43); consequently, we suggest that for trauma patients it is necessary to clarify the type of bleeding (simple type hemorrhage or oozing type hemorrhage), the type of coagulation changes (DIC or not), and when antithrombin should be administered (acute phase or sub-acute phase) to effectively identify target patients that can benefit from antithrombin administration. The results of this study provide important evidence that forms the basis for undertaking randomized controlled trials to test the efficacy of antithrombin correction in trauma-induced DIC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In addition, this study was unable to evaluate the duration and dosage of anticoagulant agents. Third, the efficacy of anticoagulant therapy might not have been evaluated correctly because we did not exclude patients with prescribed anticoagulants as with our previous studies [ 8 , 37 , 39 ]. However, sensitivity analysis of a cohort of patients with a PT-INR value ≤ 2.2 to exclude the effect of patients with an extremely high PT-INR (possibly due to the prescribed anticoagulants) confirmed the robustness of the results regarding the interaction between anticoagulant therapy and in-hospital mortality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, this study was unable to evaluate the duration and dosage of anticoagulant agents. Third, the e cacy of anticoagulant therapy might not have been evaluated correctly because we did not exclude patients with prescribed anticoagulants as with our previous study [8,15,43]. However, sensitivity analysis of a cohort of patients with a PT-INR value ≤ 2.2 to exclude the effect of patients with an extremely high PT-INR (possibly due to the prescribed anticoagulants), con rmed the robustness of the results regarding the interaction between anticoagulant therapy and in-hospital mortality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%