Abstract:Brain structural morphology differs with age. This study examined age-differences in surface-based morphometric measures of cortical thickness, volume, and surface area in a well-defined sample of 8137 generally healthy UK Biobank participants aged 45–79 years. We illustrate that the complexity of age-related brain morphological differences may be related to the laminar organization and regional evolutionary history of the cortex, and age of about 60 is a break point for increasing negative associations betwee… Show more
“…Furthermore, we investigated separate interaction effects between age, sex, educational attainment, and overall self-rated health in the association between each air pollutant and thalamic volume by adding an interaction term (e.g., age by PM 2.5 ) to the adjusted linear-regression models. We investigated these interactions because of prior work suggests that increased susceptibility to air pollution might be associated with age [2,28], that age may interact with modifiers of brain morphology [29], that sex differences in brain morphology exist [30] and may interact with air-pollution-related injury, and that air pollution might affect women and men differently [31]. Because education has been associated with both brain volume [32] and risk for neurodegenerative disease [33], there could potentially be an interaction with education since educational attainment appears to be protective in both cognitive aging and in response to brain pathology [34].…”
Background Air pollution has been associated with cognitive function and brain volume. While most previous research has examined the association between air pollution and brain volume in cortical structures or total brain volume, less research has investigated associations between exposure to air pollution and subcortical structures, including the thalamus. Further, the few available previous studies investigating associations between air pollution and thalamic volume have shown mixed results.
“…Furthermore, we investigated separate interaction effects between age, sex, educational attainment, and overall self-rated health in the association between each air pollutant and thalamic volume by adding an interaction term (e.g., age by PM 2.5 ) to the adjusted linear-regression models. We investigated these interactions because of prior work suggests that increased susceptibility to air pollution might be associated with age [2,28], that age may interact with modifiers of brain morphology [29], that sex differences in brain morphology exist [30] and may interact with air-pollution-related injury, and that air pollution might affect women and men differently [31]. Because education has been associated with both brain volume [32] and risk for neurodegenerative disease [33], there could potentially be an interaction with education since educational attainment appears to be protective in both cognitive aging and in response to brain pathology [34].…”
Background Air pollution has been associated with cognitive function and brain volume. While most previous research has examined the association between air pollution and brain volume in cortical structures or total brain volume, less research has investigated associations between exposure to air pollution and subcortical structures, including the thalamus. Further, the few available previous studies investigating associations between air pollution and thalamic volume have shown mixed results.
“…There was also some heterogeneity in the associations with regional cortical volume, whereby effects were strongest in frontal and temporal regions. These regions also exhibit the largest annual decrease in middle and older age [55], and are most informative for predicting chronological age (albeit using cortical thickness rather than volume; [56]). White matter hyperintensities, which associate with DNAm GrimAge, have also been linked to cortical loss in temporal and lateral frontal regions [57].…”
Individuals of the same chronological age exhibit disparate rates of biological ageing. Consequently, a number of methodologies have been proposed to determine biological age and primarily exploit variation at the level of DNA methylation (DNAm). A novel epigenetic clock, termed 'DNAm GrimAge' has outperformed its predecessors in predicting the risk of mortality as well as many age-related morbidities. However, the association between DNAm GrimAge and cognitive or neuroimaging phenotypes remains unknown. We explore these associations in the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936 (n = 709, mean age 73 years). Higher DNAm GrimAge was strongly associated with all-cause mortality over the eighth decade (Hazard Ratio per standard deviation increase in GrimAge: 1.81, P < 2.0 × 10 −16). Higher DNAm GrimAge was associated with lower age 11 IQ (β = −0.11), lower age 73 general cognitive ability (β = −0.18), decreased brain volume (β = −0.25) and increased brain white matter hyperintensities (β = 0.17). There was tentative evidence for a longitudinal association between DNAm GrimAge and cognitive decline from age 70 to 79. Sixty-nine of 137 health-and brain-related phenotypes tested were significantly associated with GrimAge. Adjusting all models for childhood intelligence attenuated to non-significance a small number of associations (12/69 associations; 6 of which were cognitive traits), but not the association with general cognitive ability (33.9% attenuation). Higher DNAm GrimAge associates with lower cognitive ability and brain vascular lesions in older age, independently of early-life cognitive ability. This epigenetic predictor of mortality associates with different measures of brain health and may aid in the prediction of age-related cognitive decline.
“…There was also some heterogeneity in the associations with regional cortical volume, whereby effects were strongest in frontal (superior lateral and medial) and temporal regions. These regions also exhibit the largest annual decrease in middle and older age [54], and are most informative for predicting chronological age (albeit using cortical thickness rather than volume; [55]). White matter hyperintensities, which associate with DNAm GrimAge, have also been linked to cortical loss in temporal and lateral frontal regions [56].…”
Individuals of the same chronological age exhibit disparate rates of biological ageing.Consequently, a number of methodologies have been proposed to determine biological age and primarily exploit variation at the level of DNA methylation (DNAm) -a commonly studied epigenetic mechanism. A novel epigenetic clock, termed 'DNAm GrimAge' has outperformed its predecessors in predicting the risk of mortality as well as a number of age-related morbidities. However, the association between DNAm GrimAge and cognitive or neuroimaging phenotypes remains unknown. We explore these associations in the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936 (n=709, mean age 73 years). Higher DNAm GrimAge was strongly associated with all-cause mortality over twelve years of follow-up (Hazard Ratio per standard deviation increase in GrimAge: 1.81, P < 2.0 x 10 -16 ). Higher DNAm GrimAge was associated with lower age 11 IQ (β=-0.11), lower age 73 general cognitive ability (β=-0.18), decreased brain volume (β=-0.25) and increased brain white matter hyperintensities (β=0.17). Sixtyeight of 137 health-and brain-related phenotypes tested were significantly associated with DNAm GrimAge. Adjusting all models for childhood cognitive ability attenuated to nonsignificance a small number of associations (12/68 associations; 6 of which were cognitive traits), but not the association with general cognitive ability (33.9% attenuation). Higher DNAm GrimAge cross-sectionally associates with lower cognitive ability and brain vascular lesions in older age, independently of early life cognitive ability. Thus, this epigenetic predictor of mortality is also associated with multiple different measures of brain health and may aid in the prediction of age-related cognitive decline.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.