2002
DOI: 10.1007/s10021-001-0055-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age-related Decline in Forest Ecosystem Growth: An Individual-Tree, Stand-Structure Hypothesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
176
3
20

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 246 publications
(215 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
16
176
3
20
Order By: Relevance
“…Tree foliage biomass increased with tree age reaching 29 kg tree -1 when trees were 19 years old, whereas its contribution to total tree biomass decreased from 11% to 6% and 4% at 5, 10 and 19 years old, respectively, a decreasing trend showed also in other studies (Pérez Cordero & Kanninen 2003, Kumar 2009). Stand foliage biomass also decreased from 9.7 Mg ha -1 in the fifth year to 4.4 Mg ha -1 at age 19, which could be related to declining stand growth capacity ("age-related decline in productivity" - Gower et al 1996, Ryan et al 1997, Binkley et al 2002. This also coincides with the declining trend shown between leaf biomass and tree spacing (OlaAdams 1993), as tree spacing increases with age in the sampled plantations due to the thinning regimen.…”
Section: Aboveground Biomass Allocationmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Tree foliage biomass increased with tree age reaching 29 kg tree -1 when trees were 19 years old, whereas its contribution to total tree biomass decreased from 11% to 6% and 4% at 5, 10 and 19 years old, respectively, a decreasing trend showed also in other studies (Pérez Cordero & Kanninen 2003, Kumar 2009). Stand foliage biomass also decreased from 9.7 Mg ha -1 in the fifth year to 4.4 Mg ha -1 at age 19, which could be related to declining stand growth capacity ("age-related decline in productivity" - Gower et al 1996, Ryan et al 1997, Binkley et al 2002. This also coincides with the declining trend shown between leaf biomass and tree spacing (OlaAdams 1993), as tree spacing increases with age in the sampled plantations due to the thinning regimen.…”
Section: Aboveground Biomass Allocationmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…The decrement of the intensity of the competition is due to the fact that the death of old and large trees may exceed the capability of lateral growth of surviving crowns and ingrowth in overmature stands (Zeide, 1995). There are also other ecophysiological explanations for the age-related decline of radial growth (Binkley et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although not yet analyzed for mangrove forests, the factors that determine the dependence of net productivity on age have been widely discussed over the past 20 years for terrestrial forests (Ryan et al 2004, Smith and Long 2001, Binkley et al 2002. In summary, Smith and Long (2001) show that the peaks of gross and net productivity of a forest occur when it reaches maximum leaf cover.…”
Section: Age and Successional Stagementioning
confidence: 99%