2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2006.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age-related changes in the motricity of the inbred mice strains 129/sv and C57BL/6j

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
23
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
6
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rather, motor responses were similar for MPTPp-treated and untreated mice. Moreover, at this late stage, vehicle-treated mice displayed a decline in motor performance as compared to earlier time-points, a phenomenon which might be age-related, in accordance with previous reports (Fleming et al 2004;Serradj et al 2007). In MPTPp treated-mice an age-related decline in motor performance was not detectable, likely due to the partial restoration of dopamine neurotransmission observed at the 2 months time-point (see following section), that may account for the similar motor performance displayed by treated and control mice.…”
Section: Chronic Mptpp-induced Behavioral Impairmentssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Rather, motor responses were similar for MPTPp-treated and untreated mice. Moreover, at this late stage, vehicle-treated mice displayed a decline in motor performance as compared to earlier time-points, a phenomenon which might be age-related, in accordance with previous reports (Fleming et al 2004;Serradj et al 2007). In MPTPp treated-mice an age-related decline in motor performance was not detectable, likely due to the partial restoration of dopamine neurotransmission observed at the 2 months time-point (see following section), that may account for the similar motor performance displayed by treated and control mice.…”
Section: Chronic Mptpp-induced Behavioral Impairmentssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Despite the general finding that age-related deficits are observed on this test, there remains considerable disagreement about the age at which deficits become apparent. A number of studies have reported that deficits appear around 12–13 months in C57BL/6 mice (Thouvarecq et al, 2001; Vogel et al, 2002), though deficits have been reported as early as 7 months (Fetsko et al, 2005; Serradj and Jamon, 2007). Depending on the study, paradigm, and species, deficits become progressively worse with older age, though this is not reported in all cases.…”
Section: Behavioral Tests and Age Sensitivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, C57BL/6 mice outperformed 129/Sv mice at multiple ages tested and showed a significant decrease in motor learning beginning at 7 months, which declined further at 13 months (Serradj and Jamon, 2007). 129/Sv mice showed no real improvements in motor learning from 1 to 3 months and showed a slight (but non-significant) decrease at the older ages.…”
Section: Behavioral Tests and Age Sensitivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Between the C57BL/6J (B6) and the 129X1/SvJ (129) strains of mice, the former exhibits greater motor ability in several measures of coordinated movement, yet shows greater age-related declines in coordination and motor fatigue than their 129 counterparts (Serradj and Jamon, 2007; 2009) Furthermore, work from others has indicated difference endogenous motor ability across various strains of mice (Hoit et al, 2002; Kale et al, 2004) as well as difference between strains in response to EtOH (Crabbe et al, 2008). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%