2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.07.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age-related changes in normal adult pancreas: MR imaging evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
41
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
4
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Sato et al published a study on age-dependent atrophy that stated that atrophy is most prominent in the pancreatic tail on MR images of the normal adult pancreas. They measured the anterioposterior diameter in the head, body and tail [27]. In our study, we can confirm that the longitudinal diameter of the pancreas also decreases with age.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Sato et al published a study on age-dependent atrophy that stated that atrophy is most prominent in the pancreatic tail on MR images of the normal adult pancreas. They measured the anterioposterior diameter in the head, body and tail [27]. In our study, we can confirm that the longitudinal diameter of the pancreas also decreases with age.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…However, advancing age, alcohol use, smoking, diabetes, and obesity can cause pancreatic atrophy, fatty degeneration or fibrosis in those who have chronic abdominal pain due to etiologies other than CP (5-7). In addition, chronic narcotic use for pain can lead to narcotic bowel syndrome and central sensitization of pain (9-11), both of which can be difficult to diagnose and treat, and adversely impact the outcomes after pancreatic surgery (12), including TPIAT.…”
Section: Patient Selection Indications and Timing Of Tpiatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pancreatic atrophy has been used to make the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis but remains controversial (11,32,33), and may also occur as part of the normal aging process (34). In three of these four patients, follow-up EUS was also positive.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%