2011
DOI: 10.1093/gerona/glr192
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age-Related Changes in Mouse Taste Bud Morphology, Hormone Expression, and Taste Responsivity

Abstract: Normal aging is a complex process that affects every organ system in the body, including the taste system. Thus, we investigated the effects of the normal aging process on taste bud morphology, function, and taste responsivity in male mice at 2, 10, and 18 months of age. The 18-month-old animals demonstrated a significant reduction in taste bud size and number of taste cells per bud compared with the 2- and 10-month-old animals. The 18-month-old animals exhibited a significant reduction of protein gene product… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
49
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
(77 reference statements)
8
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mice were tested as previously described [82]. Briefly, mice were placed in the gustometer for 25 mins, and stimuli were presented in random order for 5 sec trials that were initiated by the mouse licking the stimulus spouts (ACK was presented as a concentration range of 0.2, 1.0, 10, 25, 50, 75, 100 mM or water).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mice were tested as previously described [82]. Briefly, mice were placed in the gustometer for 25 mins, and stimuli were presented in random order for 5 sec trials that were initiated by the mouse licking the stimulus spouts (ACK was presented as a concentration range of 0.2, 1.0, 10, 25, 50, 75, 100 mM or water).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Behavioral assessment of taste responsivity was performed as previously described [33], [34], [35]. All taste testing took place during daylight hours, and all mice were habituated to the laboratory environment for 30 minutes each day prior to the initiation of taste testing.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Test stimuli consisted of various concentrations of sucrose (25, 75, 150, 300, 600 and 1000 mM; Fisher Scientific, Atlanta, GA), sodium chloride (NaCl:15, 100, 300, 500, 600 and 1000 mM; Sigma), denatonium benzoate (DB: 0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 0.3, 1 and 3 mM; Sigma), citric acid (CA: 0.1, 0.5, 1, 3, 5, 10, 20, 30, and 100 mM; Fisher Scientific), and intralipid (0.1%, 1%, 5%, 10%, and 20%: Sigma). Brief-access taste testing took place in a Davis MS-160 gustometer (DiLog Instruments, Tallahassee, FL) as previously described [35]. Brief-access procedures minimize post-ingestive effects that may confound other assays such as intake tests or 2-bottle taste tests.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same image exposure time was applied to sections from all treatment groups within a given comparison. Following antigen retrieval with a 1ϫ citrate buffer (Biogenex, San Ramon, CA) at 98°C for 20 min, immunofluorescence analyses were performed as described previously (37). Brain sections were blocked in 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA; Sigma) and 0.1% Tween 20 in 1ϫ Tris-buffered saline (TBS) (pH 7.4) for 1 h at room temperature, followed by incubation in a primary antibody ( Stereological Analysis-The optical fractionator probe of Stereoinvestigator software (MicroBrightField, Inc., Williston, VT) was used to obtain an unbiased estimate of NeuN-positive neurons in the striatum and associated cortex (located in the same section with striatum) as per the atlas of the mouse brain by Franklin and Paxinos (38).…”
Section: Immunochemistry Evaluations Of Mhtt In Mouse Brain-mentioning
confidence: 99%