Age‐related changes in maxillary and mandibular cortical bone thickness in relation to temporary anchorage device placement

Sathapana, S; Forrest, Alex Stewart; Monsour, P. A.; Naser-ud-Din, Shazia

doi:10.1111/adj.12018

Cited by 29 publications

(28 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Although Momin MA reported no gender-specific difference in anatomic risk of lingual plate fracture27, our data is partially supported by Sathapana’s findings that considerable difference of lingual bone thickness is observed in the retromolar region in men and women, and cortical bone increases more with age in women than in men33. However, we can’t rule out the other possibility to account for this gender difference, for example sample size, selection bias as well as measurement difference.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 61%

Topographic relationship between root apex of mesially and horizontally impacted mandibular third molar and lingual plate: cross-sectional analysis using CBCT

Wang

et al. 2016

Sci Rep

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The present study was aimed to determine the topographic relationship between root apex of the mesially and horizontally impacted mandibular third molar and lingual plate of mandible. The original cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) data of 364 teeth from 223 patients were retrospectively collected and analyzed. The topographic relationship between root apex and lingual plate on cross-sectional CBCT images was classified as non-contact (99), contact (145) and perforation (120). The cross-sectional morphology of lingual plate at the level of root apex was defined as parallel (28), undercut (38), slanted (29) and round (4). The distribution of topographic relationship between root apex and lingual plate significantly associated with gender, impaction depth, root number and lingual plate morphology. Moreover, the average bone thickness of lingual cortex and distance between root apex and the outer surface of lingual plate were 1.02 and 1.39 mm, respectively. Furthermore, multivariate regression analyses identified impaction depth and lingual plate morphology as the risk factors for the contact and perforation subtypes between root apex and lingual plate. Collectively, our findings reveal the topographic proximity of root apex of impacted mandibular third molar to the lingual plate, which might be associated with intraoperative and postoperative complications during tooth extraction.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 61%

Topographic relationship between root apex of mesially and horizontally impacted mandibular third molar and lingual plate: cross-sectional analysis using CBCT

Wang

et al. 2016

Sci Rep

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Regarding the BCB thickness, the median values of the measurements showed values from 0.9 to 3 mm, depending on the level, sex, and tooth analyzed. Previous studies analyzing the BCB of the same region found thickness values similar to the present study (Jin et al, 2012;Sathapana et al, 2013;Zekry et al, 2014;Khumsarn et al, 2016). The comparison of the BCB thickness of the maxillary premolar teeth at the five levels analyzed showed that the highest thicknesses occurred at the apical region (MA) in both sexes and in both premolars.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 86%

Assessment of Maxillary Premolar Region in Relation to Maxillary Sinus Floor and Buccal Bone Plate: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The maxillary sinus floor location and the buccal bone plate are factors to be considered in the long-term success with implant treatments mainly in the premolar region. the aim of this study was to establish morphometric characteristics of the buccal cortical bone (BCB) thickness of maxillary premolars and its relation to maxillary sinus floor through CBCT. In this study 350 first and second maxillary premolars were analyzed from 110 CBCT images and the buccal cortical bone (BCB) was measured in a coronal view at the major axis level of each premolar. In addition, in 200 first and second maxillary premolars CBCT images were measured the distance from premolar apex to maxillary sinus floor (MSF) in both frontal and sagittal plane. The type of relationship between the apex and MSF was classified according to Ok et al. (2014). The second premolar was observed with higher values of BCB (p<0.001). In first premolar, higher values were observed in the male sex (p>0.05). In second premolar, only significantly higher values were observed in the male sex in MA-MB-MC (p>0.05). Regarding to MSF and its relation to premolar roots, it was observed that 10 % of the sample was classified as type I, 19 % as type II, 55.5 % as type III and 15.5 % as type IV. The BCB of the upper premolar region is thicker in the apical region and decreases toward the coronal region. Almost 50 % of apex of second premolars are closely and risky related MSF (Type I and II).

show abstract

“…Sathapana et al examined age-related changes in mandibular buccal bone thickness in 82 CT images and reported no statistically significant difference according to age group (33). In contrast, Swasty et al observed a significant difference in bone thickness between the 10-19-year-old group and those aged 20 years and older.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mandibular Buccal Bone Thickness In Southeastern Anatolian People: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Study

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim: Buccal bone thickness is an important factor in implant treatment, bone health after tooth extraction, apical surgery, and esthetic outcomes. We evaluated the distance from the mandibular premolar and molar teeth apices to the buccal cortical bone in southeastern Anatolian people using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Methodology: This retrospective study was performed in 461 posterior teeth (220 premolars, 241 molars) of 133 patients (62 females, 64 males) at Dicle University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Data were analyzed using Student's t-tests and Tukey HSD tests. Results: The mandibular buccal bone was thicker in men than in women, but the difference was not statistically significant (p>0.05). The thinnest point of the mandibular buccal bone was measured in women as 2.431 mm and in men as 2.491 mm in the first premolar teeth. The thickest point of the mandibular bone was measured in women as 7.940 mm and in men as 7.859 mm in the distal roots of mandibular second molar teeth. For the mandibular first and second premolars, there was no significant difference in buccal bone thickness among the 10-29-, 30-49-, and 50-69-year age groups. The difference between the first and second molar mesial and distal roots of the age groups was significant at the level of buccal root thickness (p<0.05). Conclusions: It is important to examine buccal bone thickness (with CBCT) before surgical dental procedures for appropriate implant planning and surgical endodontic treatment.

show abstract

Age‐related changes in maxillary and mandibular cortical bone thickness in relation to temporary anchorage device placement

Cited by 29 publications

References 27 publications

Topographic relationship between root apex of mesially and horizontally impacted mandibular third molar and lingual plate: cross-sectional analysis using CBCT

Topographic relationship between root apex of mesially and horizontally impacted mandibular third molar and lingual plate: cross-sectional analysis using CBCT

Assessment of Maxillary Premolar Region in Relation to Maxillary Sinus Floor and Buccal Bone Plate: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study

Mandibular Buccal Bone Thickness In Southeastern Anatolian People: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About