Radioimmunoassayrevealedincreaseddynorphin A(1-8)-like immunoreactivity [dynA(1-8)LIJ in the aged rat brain. Among a number of brain regions examined, an age-related dynA(l-8)LI elevation was found only in the hippocampal formation and frontal cortex. Moreover, the increase in dynA(l-8)LI in the aged hippocampus was associated with a decline in spatial learning ability: dynA(l-8)LI distinguished aged rats that were behaviorally impaired from aged cohorts that learned the spatial task as rpidly as younger animals. Northern blot hybridization US a 2P-labeled complementary RNA probe encoding rat prodyporphin indicated that the abundance of prodynorphin mRNA was also significantly icreased in the hippocampal formation ofaged rats with identified spatial learning impairments.The neurobiological status of the aging hippocampal formation includes a loss of afferent input (1, 2), a modest decline in neuron number (3-5), a diminished complement of synaptic connections (6,7), and decreases in some measures that reflect neurochemical function (8,9). A more severe deterioration in this system is evident in the brains of patients with Alzheimer disease (10,11). The effects of aging and agerelated pathology on the hippocampal formation are likely to contribute to the emergence of mild cognitive deficits in normal aging and the progressive cognitive decline associated with Alzheimer dementia.In contrast to the attrition reported for many parameters in the aged hippocampus, this study describes a significant elevation of a neuropeptide system that, within the hippocampal formation of young adult rats, is largely restricted to the dentate granule cells and their mossy fiber projections to CA3 (12). We report that dynorphin A(1-8)-like immunoreactivity [dynA(1-8)LI] and prodynorphin mRNA are increased in the aged hippocampal formation relative to young adults. This neurobiological change was also examined in relation to the performance of aged rats on a spatial learning task that is sensitive to hippocampal dysfunction (13 Rats were trained to locate the camouflaged escape platform, which remained in the same position in the maze throughout training. Animals received three trials per day for 12 consecutive days, using a 60-sec intertrial interval. On each training trial, an animal was released in the maze from one of four equally spaced starting positions around the perimeter of the tank. The starting position varied from trial to trial, thus precluding the effective use of a response strategy (e.g., always turning left from the starting location to locate the escape platform). If an animal did not locate the escape platform within 120 sec on any trial, the experimenter placed the animal on the platform, where it remained for 30 sec. Every sixth trial consisted of a 30-sec probe trial to assess the development of a spatial bias in the maze. During these trials, animals swam with the platform removed from the pool. A criterion performance was achieved on a probe trial when an animal crossed the precise position of the esca...