2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2005.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age-related attenuation of the evening circadian arousal signal in humans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

9
113
0
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
9
113
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In both women and men, SE, SOL, ROL, TST, stage 1 sleep, stage 2 sleep, SWS, REM sleep, and/or NREM sleep significantly varied with time of day, as previously reported for a subset of participants (13)(14)(15) and with others who used imposed experimental non-24-h sleep-wake cycle procedures to desynchronize the sleep-wake and circadian cycles (16,17). The greatest and lowest sleep propensity occurred near the trough and crest of the CBT rhythm, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In both women and men, SE, SOL, ROL, TST, stage 1 sleep, stage 2 sleep, SWS, REM sleep, and/or NREM sleep significantly varied with time of day, as previously reported for a subset of participants (13)(14)(15) and with others who used imposed experimental non-24-h sleep-wake cycle procedures to desynchronize the sleep-wake and circadian cycles (16,17). The greatest and lowest sleep propensity occurred near the trough and crest of the CBT rhythm, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Interestingly, the phase advance of sleep propensity rhythms in women vs. men is reminiscent of findings from a study that also used a USW procedure to compare circadian sleep rhythms in old and young participants (17). Therefore, because young adult women are already demonstrating a circadian variation of sleep propensity that is advanced in a way similar to that of older adults, the diurnal variation of sleep in women may become worsened with age.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…However, changes in circadian parameters with aging are less consistent than age-related changes of sleep parameters, and SWS in particular. Thus, some (Czeisler et al, 1992;Münch et al, 2005;Van Coevorden et al, 1991;Weitzman et al, 1982), but not all, studies report a decline in the amplitude of CBT, melatonin, and cortisol (Monk, 2005;Niggemyer et al, 2004;Zeitzer et al, 1999). The disparity of these findings points to rather large interindividual differences in sleep and circadian rhythmicity with age and leaves the question open as to what is driving these individual differences (Van Cauter et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, sundowning is unlikely to be limited to abnormalities in the SCN itself, because other histochemical observations (Miller et al, 2005) and in vitro molecular studies of rhythmicity (Yamazaki et al, 2002) in the SCN have revealed no age-related changes. At the behavioral level, evidence indicates declines in function with aging both in the loss of responsiveness to light signals in animals (Turek et al, 1995) and in late afternoon/early evening sleepiness in normal human volunteers (Munch et al, 2005). Munch et al, (2005) inferred age-related changes in the evening oscillator.…”
Section: Circadian Variations In Magnitude Of Deficitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the behavioral level, evidence indicates declines in function with aging both in the loss of responsiveness to light signals in animals (Turek et al, 1995) and in late afternoon/early evening sleepiness in normal human volunteers (Munch et al, 2005). Munch et al, (2005) inferred age-related changes in the evening oscillator. The evening oscillator, which tracks the change from the daily period of high light intensity toward darkness, depends on the relative activities of two clock genes (Steinlechner et al, 2002;Weinert et al, 2005), and is altered in senile mice (Weinert and Weinert, 2003).…”
Section: Circadian Variations In Magnitude Of Deficitmentioning
confidence: 99%