2017
DOI: 10.3233/wor-172555
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age-related associations between work over-commitment and zest for work among Swedish employees from a cross-sectional and longitudinal perspective

Abstract: The longitudinal findings among older employees could be relevant regarding the expected need to remain occupationally active longer.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A buffering effect of social support on high demands has been shown ( 27 ) and is also supported by the results of the present study. In a recent study, work over-commitment was related to poor zest for work ( 20 ). This is in agreement with the results of the present study if the positive relations between support and the indices of well-being, zest for work, and not wanting to leave work are interpreted as a positive buffering effect of support on employees’ health and work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A buffering effect of social support on high demands has been shown ( 27 ) and is also supported by the results of the present study. In a recent study, work over-commitment was related to poor zest for work ( 20 ). This is in agreement with the results of the present study if the positive relations between support and the indices of well-being, zest for work, and not wanting to leave work are interpreted as a positive buffering effect of support on employees’ health and work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Answers were divided into high (alternative i or ii) or low (iv or v) zest groups, or for ordinal scale (i–v) analysis. This question was taken from a psychosocial questionnaire developed by Sigvard Rubenowitz and has been used earlier ( 19 , 20 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%