1991
DOI: 10.1080/11035899109453203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age of porphyry-type deposits in the Skellefte District, northern Sweden

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The zircon cores would hence represent recycling of Palaeoproterozoic rocks while Archaean material is lacking, which is consistent with previous studies of the SD González Roldán, 2010;Wilson et al, 1987). The QFP emplacement age is younger, and within the analytical error of the previously reported 1886 +15/−9 Ma age of Weihed and Schöberg (1991). The disagreement between the new SIMS and the older TIMS data is suggested to be due to a mixed age between zircon rim and zircon core in the latter, a problem also noted by Weihed and Schöberg (1991).…”
Section: The Heterogeneous Gi Magmatic Phasesupporting
confidence: 86%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The zircon cores would hence represent recycling of Palaeoproterozoic rocks while Archaean material is lacking, which is consistent with previous studies of the SD González Roldán, 2010;Wilson et al, 1987). The QFP emplacement age is younger, and within the analytical error of the previously reported 1886 +15/−9 Ma age of Weihed and Schöberg (1991). The disagreement between the new SIMS and the older TIMS data is suggested to be due to a mixed age between zircon rim and zircon core in the latter, a problem also noted by Weihed and Schöberg (1991).…”
Section: The Heterogeneous Gi Magmatic Phasesupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The QFP emplacement age is younger, and within the analytical error of the previously reported 1886 +15/−9 Ma age of Weihed and Schöberg (1991). The disagreement between the new SIMS and the older TIMS data is suggested to be due to a mixed age between zircon rim and zircon core in the latter, a problem also noted by Weihed and Schöberg (1991). The porphyritic, quartz vein brecciated intrusion at Tallberg (sample ALA24-89), yields a considerably younger rim age (1871±9 Ma) compared to most of the QFP dykes in the study area, but also a significantly larger error, overlapping with all QFP dyke ages.…”
Section: The Heterogeneous Gi Magmatic Phasementioning
confidence: 53%
See 3 more Smart Citations