2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.rgg.2010.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age of picrite and picrodolerite magmatism in western Mongolia

Abstract: The paper presents 39Ar/40Ar and UPb (SHRIMP zircon method) geochronological data on minor picrodolerite intrusions from western Mongolia. Picrodolerite magmatism in western Mongolia took place within different age intervals and in different geodynamic settings: accretionary–collisional Ꞓ1-2, ~510 Ma (Üüreg Nuur association, Hayrhan intrusion), intraplate D1, 410–390 Ma (Tsagaan Shuvuut Range, Mor’t Uula intrusion), intraplate D3–C1, 345–360 Ma (Altan Gadas, Tavtyn Hundiyn, and Hu Tsan Bulak intrusions), islan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During the Late Cambrian, a new NE and/or east dipping subduction system developed along the SW and west margins of the Mongolian Precambrian blocks giving rise to the generation of widespread arc magmatism (with maximum activity at circa 510 Ma) variously intruding the Precambrian basement and the accreted Lake Zone (e.g., Izokh et al, ; Mongush et al, ; Rudnev et al, ; Yarmolyuk et al, ), exemplified by the Ikh‐Mongol arc system (see Janoušek et al, Figure ). We propose that formation of this giant arc was connected with the development of an equally giant turbidite basin to the south or west (Figure ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the Late Cambrian, a new NE and/or east dipping subduction system developed along the SW and west margins of the Mongolian Precambrian blocks giving rise to the generation of widespread arc magmatism (with maximum activity at circa 510 Ma) variously intruding the Precambrian basement and the accreted Lake Zone (e.g., Izokh et al, ; Mongush et al, ; Rudnev et al, ; Yarmolyuk et al, ), exemplified by the Ikh‐Mongol arc system (see Janoušek et al, Figure ). We propose that formation of this giant arc was connected with the development of an equally giant turbidite basin to the south or west (Figure ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Locations of geochronological age in the Lake and Mongolian Altay. Numbers of each box refer to data from (1) Kovalenko et al, , (2) Gibsher et al, , (3) Jian et al, , (4) Khain et al, , (5) Pfänder et al, , (6) Dijkstra et al, , (7) Izokh et al, , , (8) Lehmann et al, , (9) Stipska et al, 2010, (10) Mongush, Lebedev, Travin, & Yarmolyuk, , (11) Hrdličková et al, , (12) Yarmolyuk et al, , (13) Rudnev et al, , ; Rudnev, Kovach, & Ponomarchuk, , (14) Buriánek et al, , and (15) Jiang et al, [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]…”
Section: The Geology Of the Lake And Mongolian Altay Zonesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Altai orogen is located in the western CAOB, which is the world largest accretionary orogen and has been expensively studied during the last 20 years (e.g., Zonenshain et al, 1990;Buslov et al, 2001;Kröner et al, 2007Kröner et al, , 2014Kovalenko et al, 2004;Xiao et al, 2003Xiao et al, , 2010Windley et al, 2007;Polyakov et al, 2008;Izokh et al, 2010Izokh et al, , 2011Safonova et al, 2011;Yarmolyuk et al, 2012). It is situated between the Gorny Altai in Russia to the north and the Western Junggar to the south (Fig.…”
Section: Geological Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%