2014
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9817.12040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age of acquisition and imageability: a cross‐task comparison

Abstract: Previous research has reported an imageability effect on visual word recognition. Words that are high in imageability are recognised more rapidly than are those lower in imageability. However, later researchers argued that imageability was confounded with age of acquisition. In the current research, these two factors were manipulated in a factorial design to assess their effect in a lexical decision task and a progressive demasking task. Across both tasks, there was a clear and robust effect of age of acquisit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the evidence seems to indicate that the AoA effect can be found specifically in the connections between orthography and semantic representations. In a PDT, Ploetz and Yates (2016) observed that imageability effects were larger for late-acquired words than early-acquired words. Ploetz and Yates concluded that the imageability effect arose from the semantic feedback to orthographic processing, while orthographic-semantic processes caused the AoA effect.…”
Section: Theoretical Account Of Aoa Effectsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Furthermore, the evidence seems to indicate that the AoA effect can be found specifically in the connections between orthography and semantic representations. In a PDT, Ploetz and Yates (2016) observed that imageability effects were larger for late-acquired words than early-acquired words. Ploetz and Yates concluded that the imageability effect arose from the semantic feedback to orthographic processing, while orthographic-semantic processes caused the AoA effect.…”
Section: Theoretical Account Of Aoa Effectsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The AoA effect has been demonstrated in many tasks including recognition without identification (e.g., Catling et al, 2021), word naming (e.g. Ellis & Morrison, 1998), phrasal lexical decision (Arnon et al, 2017) and progressive demasking (Ploetz & Yates, 2016). For more information about the AoA effects in lexical tasks and neuro-diverse populations such as aphasic patients see reviews by Brysbaert and Ellis (2016) and Elsherif et al (2023).…”
Section: What Is the Aoa Effect?mentioning
confidence: 99%