1990
DOI: 10.1080/00140139008925333
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age, IQ and awareness, and recall of errors

Abstract: Younger people report more lapses than the elderly on the Broadbent Cognitive Failure Questionnaire, the Harris and Sunderland Memory Failure Questionnaire, and a 'Lost and Found' questionnaire. Lapses are not predicted by IQ or vocabulary test scores (AH 4 parts 1 and 2, and Mill Hill). These paradoxical findings reveal some logical and methodological difficulties in the interpretations of subjective self-ratings. Age and IQ differences in the memorability of errors were illustrated using choice reaction time… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
46
2

Year Published

1992
1992
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
5
46
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is consistent with Giambra's (1989) finding that young subjects report more irrelevant thought intrusions than old subjects. In general, our results are consistent with reports by Rabbitt (1990) and Kane et al (1994) that old subjects do not report more cognitive failures in everyday activities than do young subjects.…”
Section: Cfqsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This result is consistent with Giambra's (1989) finding that young subjects report more irrelevant thought intrusions than old subjects. In general, our results are consistent with reports by Rabbitt (1990) and Kane et al (1994) that old subjects do not report more cognitive failures in everyday activities than do young subjects.…”
Section: Cfqsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The automaticity of error correction is seen during tasks in which these involuntary corrections cannot always be suppressed, even when subjects were instructed not to be concerned with correction (Rabbitt, 1990). The present concern was whether errors required further processing after the movement was made.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In an elegant series of studies in which participants were required to signal whether they had committed an error or not, the post-error slowing effect was observed even in those trials that were not consciously registered and signaled (Rabbitt, 1968(Rabbitt, , 1990(Rabbitt, , 2002). This result clearly shows the automatic and involuntary character of posterror slowing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%