2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11042-019-7694-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age-invariant face recognition using gender specific 3D aging modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accuracy is derived from the true positive (TP), true negative (TN), false positive (FP), and false negative (FN) values as shown in (1). True positives are correct positive classifications.…”
Section: Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Accuracy is derived from the true positive (TP), true negative (TN), false positive (FP), and false negative (FN) values as shown in (1). True positives are correct positive classifications.…”
Section: Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The augmented dataset is usually used independently of each other to verify the invariability of designed face recognition systems. Two of the most common face image datasets used in age-invariant face recognition, FG-NET and MORPH [1] are usually at the centre of comparisons made to check the performance of age-invariant face recognition system. The goal is to have a good performance for Bulletin of Electr Eng & Inf ISSN: 2302-9285  Comparative analysis of augmented datasets performances of age invariant face… (Kennedy Okokpujie) 1357 all datasets used for face recognition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main factors that affect FR include (i) pose [37,47,3,18], (ii) illumination [2,49,42], (iii) facial expression [29,30,28], (iv) age [31,6] and, (v) gender variations [44,27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jia et al [33] proposed the use of deep autoencoder for compact shape feature expression and image retrieval, and achieved good results. Riaz et al [34] compared and analyzed the performance of auto-encoder and principal component analysis in face recognition applications. Both methods are used for feature generation and selection, and it is found that auto-encoder is superior to principal component analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%